Thursday, February 26, 2015

When MEDICINE becomes MURDER

by Mike Adams, Health Ranger - NaturalNews.com

With each passing day as vaccine fanaticism spreads like a virus of the mind across the mainstream media, America is marching down the path of genocide and heinous human rights violations in the name of "SCIENCE!"

The very arguments used by today's vaccine pushers to claim that the government should force everyone to be vaccinated against their will closely resemble the eugenics justifications of Nazi Germany.

The collection of Nazi propaganda posters you see below has been translated by Natural News in order to show the parallels between Nazi crimes against humanity and today's fanatical vaccine mandate schemes that are based on very similar moral justification and distorted logic.

Today, people like Oregon State Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward are marching America down the path of Nazi Germany, using the exact same arguments and attempted moral justifications that were once invoked by Adolf Hitler.

Nazi propaganda poster: The Ideal Man

Along with policies of forced euthanasia, sterilization, organ harvesting and medical experimentation, the "science" Nazi regime attempted to use positive imagery to claim it was creating a better society.

The following Nazi poster shows the "ideal man and woman" as desired by the state:

In Pennsylvania, a similar poster promotes vaccines with an attempt at patriotism, saying you "Earn your stripe!" when you get vaccinated:

German poster advocating the forced euthanasia of the physically handicapped

This propaganda poster explains that diseased and physically handicapped people are a financial burden on the state. Therefore, the thinking goes, they should all be euthanized for the "greater good."

This is the same "greater good" logic now invoked by vaccine pushers in America who believe it is morally justified to harm and kill some children with vaccines because the policy serves the interests of the state:

A congenitally diseased or handicapped person costs the government 5.5 Reichsmark daily.

For 5.5 Reichsmark a healthy, sound family can live a full day of life.

This flu shot poster in the United States argues that flu shots "save lives," glossing over the reality that flu shots still contain mercury, a potent neurotoxic heavy metal that causes permanent brain damage:

Kill the mentally ill negros

This Nazi poster complains about the cost of the government providing care for a "mentally ill negro" who has been institutionalized for 16 years.

As with all the other posters shown here, the argument is that killing people like this negro is "good for society!" It's the same argument used with forced vaccinations, forced organ harvesting and the government's health care "death panels" in America today.

Mentally ill negro (English citizen)
16 years in an institution
RM 35,000 in costs

CDC commits scientific fraud to bury autism risk affecting African-Americans

In the United States, top CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson openly admitted that the CDC committed scientific fraud to bury data linking vaccines to autism in African-American boys.

As this truth emerged, the CDC went to extraordinary lengths to censor the story, and the entire mainstream media was ordered by the U.S. government to blackball the confession and avoid any mention of it. To this day, the confession of the CDC whistleblower remains the most heavily censored medical story in U.S. history.

Just like in Nazi Germany, America's medical system utterly abandons people of dark skin color, considering them "not worth saving." Medicine in America today is not just murder; it's also genocide.

Granny is next, too. Here's a real cover for Newsweek, announcing, "The Case for Killing Granny." The article argued that the U.S. government needed to save money by killing off the elderly:

Moral justification for the mass killing of the physically handicapped

This next poster argues for the forced killing of the physically handicapped by announcing how much money such people cost the state in health care expenses.

The message informs the people of Germany that their money is being wasted on handicapped citizens, implying that killing off those people creates a better society.

This congenitally handicapped person costs the nation, as a whole, 60,000 Reichsmark over a lifetime.

People this is your money.

Read Neuses Volk ("New People")

The monthly newsletter of the racially correct political bureau of the NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party)

This TIME Magazine issue argued that the elderly in America should be murdered by removing their feeding tubes as they lay in their hospital beds:

Murdering children in the name of God

This next poster invokes God, claiming that even God would not want sick or handicapped people to reproduce.

Therefore, the logic goes, it is the "will of God" that the state murder these "undesirables." This is based on the belief that the state owns the people -- the very same idea now being aggressively pushed in America by vaccine fanatics who think the government has the right to force medical interventions on people against their wishes.

God cannot intend that the sick and infirmed propagate or reproduce sickness and infirmity (physical or mental weakness).

Worthless people are multiplying faster!

This poster explains how "worthless people" are multiplying faster than the healthy population. This includes the physically handicapped and mentally ill.

The Nazi war on handicapped people mirrors today's mainstream media war against so-called "anti-vaxxers" who happen to be among the most well-informed people in the world on health issues.

In order for any government to imprison or murder large numbers of people, it must first label them as a burden on society:

Those worth less are multiplying faster than the healthy population!

Number of pregnancies of mothers who had mentally ill children in school for the mentally disabled...
... the average mother in the city [is] concerned

Euthanasia candidates

This is a picture of children who are candidates for euthanasia. In America today, unvaccinated children are being labeled using the same derogatory language (even though most unvaccinated children are, in reality, far more intelligent and far healthier than vaccinated children).

Euthanasia victims vs. vaccine victims

In Nazi Germany, victims of birth deformities were frequently slated for euthanasia by the state.

In America today, victims of vaccine damage are utterly abandoned by the state, forgotten by the CDC and lying legislators like Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Here's an image of Germany's physically handicapped, scheduled for euthanasia:

And here are some images of American children damaged by vaccines -- who are then entirely abandoned by doctors, the media and lawmakers:

Neurologically damaged by the DPT vaccine:

Extreme tissue damage caused by vaccines:

The HPV vaccine turned this normal, healthy girl into a brain-damaged victim of vaccines:

Another severe skin reaction following vaccination:

Hitler orders health authorities to find more people to euthanize the terminally ill

Under a medical police state system -- which is precisely what is now being constructed in Oregon, California and many other states across America -- the state can determine when to kill you. The state owns your body, after all, and that precedent was already established when the people refused to resist vaccine mandates.

On Sep. 1, 1939, Adolf Hitler ordered Germany's medical doctors to recruit more people who would name people to be euthanized against their will.

Included on this list for euthanasia targets were people with cancer, physical handicaps, liver disorders and other health challenges:

Letter from Adolf Hitler
Berlin Sept. 1, 1939

To the Reichsleiter (leader) Bouhler and Dr. Brandt (a Medical Dr.):

They have the responsibility to increase the authority of individuals who will be named to evaluate the terminally ill to determine whether euthanasia can be performed...

Forced sterilization of the innocent

This Nazi propaganda poster argued that Germany's forced euthanasia and sterilization policies were morally justified because other countries were doing the same thing.

In fact, there was "scientific consensus" at the time that any government could order the murder of handicapped, retarded or chronically ill citizens. Government-sponsored murder was justified under the same "greater good" logic used by vaccine pushers in America today:

We do not stand alone

In these countries similar laws exist: USA Denmark Norway Sweden Finland
The following countries are considering similar protection: Hungary England Switzerland [illegible]

Law for the Prevention of Offspring with Hereditary Diseases from 7/14/33

Mentally handicapped people are costing you a lot of money, so let's kill them all

This poster insists that mentally handicapped people should be killed because they are placing a burden on society.

You are sharing the load

A person with a hereditary disease costs on average RM 50,000 by the time they reach their 60th birthday.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Tell Congress to Put an Expiration Date on Unconstitutional Bulk Surveillance

Key parts of the Patriot Act expire soon -- so we have a new opportunity to push back against ongoing, illegal, mass surveillance of Americans.

Will you join our coalition effort demanding that Congress put an end to mass spying?
The government has used the Patriot Act to claim enormous new powers to spy on all of us -- and has lied about it with impunity.

It's gone too far, but this spring, key provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire – including one that the NSA claims lets it collect private data about all of our phone calls.
It's illegal and ineffective, and it must STOP.

This spying is so offensive that the original sponsor of the Patriot Act, Representative Jim Sensenbrenner, is urging colleagues to sign a letter asserting that they will vote against reauthorization if the law is not amended to ban mass surveillance.

More signatures on the letter mean more power for us and our allies as the Patriot Act approaches its sunset.
Will you click here to urge your lawmakers to sign it the letter? It'll just take a second, and will strengthen our position as we approach the Patriot Act expiration.

We've come close to reining in the NSA several times -- with your help, we can win this one.
Click here to join us and our partners as we tell Congress that we can't allow unconstitutional mass surveillance of Americans to continue.

-Watchdog.net

Monday, February 23, 2015

Stop Obama's Plan To Tax and Control The Internet Before 02/26/15!

The FCC will vote this Thursday, February 26th, on Obama's plan to tax and censor the internet.
The FCC is a five-member panel with 3 Democrats and 2 Republicans, so we already know that this rigged vote will fall in favor of Obama's so-called "Net Neutrality" plan.
The only way that you can stop Obama from taxing your internet use and shutting down your favorite conservative Christian websites through censorship is by convincing Congress to intervene.
HR 279 is a bill that would limit the FCC's (and Obama's) authority over broadband internet service providers. This bill does an end-run around Obama's entire 332-page secret plan to control the internet.
The bill will allow the Congress, representing "we the people," to keep the internet open and free as it has been for years, rather than allowing Obama to seize control of the web through a regulatory agency.
Call - (202) 225-2927 and/or fax - (202) 225-1919 the House Energy & Commerce Committee and your US House Representatives today and demand that they pass HR 279 immediately! (See bottom of post for an example fax/statement).

We are running out of time before this Thursday vote in the FCC, so you must take action quickly.
Obama is trying to reclassify the internet as a public utility under the Communications Act of 1934.
That original Act was drafted based on shipping regulations that the federal government used in the 1800s. How can these rules possibly apply in a fair manner to 21st century technology such as the internet?
If these rules pass, Obama will have the authority to tax your internet use. Through regulations from the FCC (and soon the FEC, the Federal Elections Commission), he will be able to shut down conservative and Christian websites, everything from the Drudge Report to Pray For US.
This fight is the greatest threat to freedom of speech that America has ever seen!
HR 279 would amend the Communications Act of 1934 so that the FCC cannot tamper with internet service providers as if they are telephone companies.
The internet is an INFORMATION service, not a COMMUNICATIONS service, as Obama and the FCC are trying to claim, and HR 279 will set this in stone.
Tell the House of Representatives to pass Bob Latta's HR 279 immediately to protect the internet from Obama's wishes to be a dictator!
John 3:20 in the Bible tells us, "For every one that does evil hates the light, and will not come to the light, otherwise his deeds would be reproved."
If Obama's plan to impose "net neutrality" is so good for the internet, then why is no one outside of the FCC allowed to see this secret plan before it is passed?
The answer is, Obama's plan is evil. It will crush freedom of speech and will prevent elderly people on fixed incomes from being able to afford the internet. Obama's plan is evil, through and through.
You must speak out immediately and demand that Congress stop Obama's dictatorial internet grab, by passing HR 279 at once!

Calling Obama a dictator on this issue is not an exaggeration. In fact, former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell says that foreign dictators LOVE Obama's net neutrality plan. Obama is trying to control the internet in the same way that foreign dictators do: Regulation, taxation and censorship!
Send your demands to stop him right now.

Then, please warn others about this issue, because the mainstream media has completely ignored the fact that Obama is about to tax and censor the internet. Share this info with everyone among your family members, friends and acquaintances who wants to keep the internet open and free.

Sincerely,
Charles Benninghoff, Founder
Pray For US
2360 Corporate Circle, Suite 400
Henderson, Nevada 89074-7722
https://PrayFor.US/150220_31113_p4us_pp_Obama_Internet_Grab_Coming/
**********************************************************************
Example fax/statement:

Your First Name Last Name
Address
City, State Zip

Fred Upton
2183 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairman Upton:

Obama's secret 332-page plan to regulate, tax and censor the internet under the guise of "Net Neutrality" is the greatest threat to freedom of speech that the United States has ever seen. The fact that Obama is attempting to take over control of the internet through a regulatory agency, rather than trying to do it through a vote of Congress, should tell you all that you need to know about this plan.

From what we know of this secret plan, the FCC will reclassify the internet as a public utility under the Communications Act of 1934. This Act originated from shipping regulations in the 1800s. How can it possibly be applied in a reasonable manner to 21st-century technology?

Furthermore, the Communications Act of 1934 applies to communications services. The internet is not a communication service -- it is an INFORMATION service, which is why the internet has been referred to as an "information super-highway."

You can circumvent Obama's freedom-killing plan to tax and censor the internet by immediately passing HR 279, a bill that would amend the Communications Act of 1934 in order to limit the FCC's ability to meddle with broadband internet service providers.

The internet has been regulation-free for years under bipartisan consensus. Only a truly radical, un-American with a dictator complex would seek to destroy the internet through taxation and censorship. Perhaps that is why one former FCC Commissioner says that foreign dictators love Obama's Net Neutrality scheme.

Do the right thing for America! Pass HR 279 immediately to stop Obama's internet takeover!

Sincerely,

(Your First Name Last Name Here)

Sunday, February 22, 2015

States Have Given Up Their Educational Control And Parents' Rights!

ALERT: HR 5, the Student Success Act of 2015

The following information is critically important. It should go viral immediately. Send it to every parent and grandparent, school board member, state legislator, voter, friend.... Post it on Facebook, websites, blogs, etc. Time is very short! This bill is on the FAST TRACK! The vote on H.R. 5 may take place as early as Tuesday Feb. 24.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Anita B Hoge 724-263-0474
Ryan Bannister 717-919-2122
Gen Yvette Sutton 610-507-9113
Cheryl Boise 412-389-6896
Rich Felice 484-678-2236

Pennsylvanians Restoring Education

Pennsylvanians Against Common Core
February 20, 2015, Harrisburg, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, PA.

Citizens of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvanians Restoring Education, Pennsylvania Against Common Core, parents and students are asking Representative John Kline to stop theREAUTHORIZATION of ESEA, HR 5, the Student Success Act of 2015 which will amend No Child Left Behind.

HR 5 denies parents their rights over their children. Reference pages 488; 522-555.

HR 5 legislation creates the radical transformation of tax collectionthrough the assigned destruction and hostile takeover of our local neighborhood schools.

HR 5 violates states' rights under the United States Constitution.

HR 5 is designed to destroy local, public neighborhood schoolsthrough usurpation of elected school boards' authorities and responsibilities.

HR 5 will destroy all private education in America, as well, legislating Title I "choice" vouchers that will "follow the child," enforcing HR 5 compliance in EVERY PRIVATE AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.

HR 5 would legislate services to these Title I "choice" children called DIRECT STUDENT SERVICES AS A VOUCHER that must be equitable and comparable to any public school, which is needed to satisfy Common Core.

HR 5 will destroy representative government, all non-governmental schools, and standardize education across this nation. This overreach of the federal government is in direct violation of our United States Constitution which dictates separation of federal jurisdiction vs. State jurisdiction.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, you state in the Student Success Act HR 5, Press Release, February 3, 2015:

".....This proposal provides an opportunity to chart a new course...."

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, this "new course" that you are forcing on the states will end in Constitutional chaos.

HR 5 removes Constitutional states' rights sovereignty.

HR 5 redefines parent and removes parental rights over the upbringing of their children.

HR 5 subjugates state legislatures under blatantly false pretenses about state and local control.

HR 5 presents choice vouchers defined as "direct student services," as a means to control private and religious schools and phase out public schools.

HR 5 would transform ALL SCHOOLS into government schools. Has every state ceded the land that these schools occupy, turning them into federal lands? If the states have not ceded the land to the federal government, the federal government's jurisdiction is determined to be severely limited, unless altered drastically by the state legislature. Questions of jurisdiction would still remain. At the least, HR 5 obfuscates state and federal jurisdictions as specified in the Constitution and affirmed in numerous Supreme Court decisions.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE Who "Grubered" your HR 5 and consigned the states to federal takeover?

HR 5 forces private and religious schools to provide services through an APPROVED state list of providers eliminating the freedom for private and religious schools to teach students to their own standards and select their own curriculum.

HR 5 forces private and religious schools to provide non-cognitive mental health areas of personality development and interventions whereby proficiency levels in the social, emotional, and behavioral domain are scored to a criterion resulting in violations of privacy under the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, federal law, state law, and civil rights laws.

HR 5 uses choice vouchers to dissolve the public school system through the exodus of (departure of) Choice, Title I, at-risk students who disengage from the public school and enter a private or religious school. Public schools are presently represented by locally elected school board members in the United States. The destruction of our neighborhood public school system undermines the power and authority of property tax provisions and elected school board representation on the local level, representation which financially supports local education agencies.

HR 5 provides for the expansion of charter schools as thesanctioned alternative for schooling. As you, Representative Kline, must know, charter schools are a system of schooling without elected boards. They use public tax monies regulated by federal government mandates, standards, assessment and teacher remediation with data tracking and trafficking and re-education toward Common Core standards.

HR 5 by design eliminates local and state representative government by removing the states’ rights and local control of education and surrenders our children's education and future to the dictates of the federal government.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, H.R. 5 is a Constitutional Crisis in the Making.

HR 5 requires that states legislatively surrender their rights over education in order to receive Title I funds.

HR 5 removes the parents as the final arbiters in the upbringing of their children, and wrestles control of private and religious education through federal encroachment as explained below.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, quoting from your HR 5 legislation, on page 552, you stipulate the criteria for removing the state legislature's constitutional power, rights, and responsibilities as follows:

Subpart 4—Restoration of State Sovereignty Over Public Education and Parental Rights Over the Education of Their Children

‘‘SEC. 6561. STATES TO RETAIN RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES

THEY DO NOT EXPRESSLY WAIVE.

‘‘(a) RETENTION OF RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES.— No officer, employee, or other authority of the Secretary shall enforce against an authority of a State, nor shall any authority of a State have any obligation to obey, any requirement imposed as a condition of receiving assistance under a grant program established under this Act, nor shall such program operate within a State, unless the legislature of that State shall have by law expressly approved that program and, in doing so, HAVE waived the State’s rights and authorities to act inconsistently with any requirement that might be imposed by the Secretary as a condition of receiving that assistance." (Emphasis added)

"(b) AMENDMENT OF TERMS OF RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

An officer, employee, or other authority of the Secretary may release assistance under a grant program established under this Act to a State only after the legislature of the State has by law expressly approved the program (as described in sub- section (a)). This approval may be accomplished by a vote to affirm a State budget that includes the use of such Federal funds and any such State budget must expressly include any requirement imposed as a condition of receiving assistance under a grant program established under this Act so that by approving the budget, the State legislature is expressly approving the grant program and, in doing so, waiving the State’s rights and authorities to act inconsistently with any requirement that might be imposed by the Secretary as a condition of receiving that assistance." (Emphasis added)

The passage of your bill out of committee to be voted on by the entire House of Representatives by February 24 must be stopped. The HR 5 Reauthorization of ESEA, amending No Child Left Behind, must be stopped because the provisions inherent in this legislation are egregious and lack Constitutional authority. Passage of H.R. 5 will bring about the destruction of the United States system of public education as well as the radical transformation of representative government both at the state and local level.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, these states' rights issues have not been discussed at your hearings. Is each state legislature aware of the fact that these measures, hidden in federal and state statute, will remove their state’s guaranteed rights under the Constitution? Will each state, including your own state of Minnesota, have to amend its own state constitution to comply with HR 5?

Several states have recently added language in their state statutes that in effect cedes jurisdiction to the federal government.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, have you advised the following states of the impact of the HR 5 legislation:

Pennsylvania has currently proposed legislation, HB 168, Sec. 121(a) (Representative Tobash), that states it will comply to federal ESEA legislation and future ESEAlegislation:

"The Department of Education shall develop and implement Keystone Exams in [the following subjects:]........as required by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425) or any successor statute." (lines 17, 18, 19 ) (Emphasis added)

Oklahoma, in an effort to stop Common Core, the Oklahoma legislature's passage ofHouse Bill 3399, Sec. 11-103.6a 4 (page 18) with the purpose to remove Common Core Standards, defined in their bill that they would succumb to ESEA federal law:

"Upon the effective date of this act, the State Board of Education shall seek certification from the State Regents for Higher Education that the subject matter standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics which were in place prior to the revisions adopted by the Board in June 2010 are college-and career-ready as defined in the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility document issued by the United States Department of Education." (emphasis added)

The Oklahoma legislature codified Common Core through ESEA and gave up its state's rights authority by surrendering education and students to federal control.

Indiana's supposed departure from Common Core in HB 1427, (Sec. 14.5(a) C, page 9) also surrenders its state's rights in order to comply with federal standards.

"Provides that the state board shall implement educational standards that use the common core standards as the base model for academic standards to the extent necessary to comply with federal standards to receive a Flexibility Waiver." (emphasis added)

South Carolina's bill, H3893, (Sec 3, section 59-18-325, (C)(1) passed to stop Common Core and the Smarter Balanced Test is yet another example of a state surrendering its state's rights over education and students to the federal government. In fact this law restores Common Core:

"The summative assessment must assess students in English/language arts and mathematics, including those students as required by the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and by Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. [For purposes of this subsection, 'English/language arts' includes English, reading, and writing skills as required by existing state standards." [NOTE: The existing State standards are Common Core.] (emphasis added)

The state of Washington is yet another example. Reference Senate Bill 6030, (Sec 6, (4)(a) page 16, lines 17-20):

"..and shall not conflict with requirements contained in Title I of the federal elementary and secondary education act of 1965, or the requirements of the Carl D. Perkins vocational education 20 act of 1998, each as amended." (Emphasis added)

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, have these states been apprised of the devious design in HR 5 to take away states' rights granted under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution?

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, why have your hearings not discussed the aspect of the "direct student services" that is defined as PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE FOR ALL PRIVATE AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS? Why have these services not been discussed... services that each private and religious school MUST "provide on an equitable basis" to meet the individual needs of each child who receives a SUPER VOUCHER? Why does the state require that private or religious schools MUST use "approved academic tutoring services as determined by a provider on a State approved list"? Schools will be subjected to discrimination charges if they deny matriculation of a Title I child even if they cannot financially support the OPEN-ENDED direct services mandated in HR 5, as explained below -- even if it bankrupts them.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, why is "meaningful choice" defined as complying to state standards (Common Core) and interventions identified for each "at-risk" child receiving the following services: Special Education, instructional support services, counseling, mentoring, one-to-one tutoring, and other benefits for the Title I child? Why is there wording that mandates that a private or religious school MUST comply with the Civil Rights Act, (the school cannot deny admittance to a Title I choice child) 504Rehabilitation Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, (MUST administer services for mental health disabilities), IDEA (MUST administer behavioral screening, response to interventions, positive behavioral interventions and supports, mental health wrap-around, BILLABLE MEDICAID SERVICES, mental health services or specialized student support services), General Education Provisions Act (GEPA).

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, you know full well that HR 5 will codify the Family Education Rights in Privacy Act (FERPA). This important Act, as it stands now, has been totally gutted due to President Obama’s Executive Order, EO 12866, January, 2012. FERPA now allows personally identifiable information on the student to be released without informed written parental consent. This personally identifiable information on the students includes anecdotal, psychological observations, analysis, and reeducation interventions in the affective domain by teachers, all tracked and trafficked.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, why must private and religious schools provide the following specialized Instructional support on an equitable basis with public school students?

Services defined as school counselors, social workers, school psychologists, or other qualified professional personnel providing assessment, diagnosis, counseling education, therapeutic and other necessary services defined in Sec. 602 IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, when in fact Common Core has been expanded into the mental health personal trait standards defined as social, emotional, and behavioral weaknesses now coded as a disability?

The State Education Agency names an ombudsman, "an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration, especially that of public authorities," for the following equitable services in each private and religious school: monitoring and enforcement requirements of private and religious schools, including reeducation in the affective domain. Obviously, under HR 5 the SEA will operate independently with no accountability to the state legislature which has surrendered its authority and responsibility over education and the students.

Referring to the concept of Title I funds that will "follow the child" and the super voucher called "direct student services”: the Title I fund that "follows the child" is going directly to every child, bypassing state government. No one at the public hearings explained that CHOICE, TITLE I FUNDS "FOLLOWING THE 'at-risk' CHILD" would be used to destroy the financial base of public schools which have elected school boards and are funded by local tax dollars. HR 5 is purposely designed to destroy the traditional public school system.

Furthermore, REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, there are scores of pages in your ESEAlegislation that would expand CHARTER SCHOOLS OPERATING WITHOUT BOARDS ELECTED BY THE TAXPAYERS AS THEIR REPRESENTATIVES. THIS IS A SET UP FOR CHARTER SCHOOL TAKEOVER OF ALL EDUCATION with charter school authorizers to control private and religious schools. Yet, no one explained HOW these Title I funds "following" a CHOICE, TITLE I "at risk" CHILD will impact the intrusion into private and religious schools, which will be forced into all of the mandates that come with Common Core implementation and EVERY CHILD identified and funded through Title I and thereby subverting the mission of the private and religious school.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, you have crafted HR 5 behind closed doors and put it on the fast track to correspond to the "spitball" known as the ESEA Reauthorization.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, your HR 5 merged with the Senate version of ESEA REAUTHORIZATION will NATIONALIZE EDUCATION BYPASSING LOCAL CONTROL AND STATE CONTROL, ELIMINATING LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT, THE HALLMARK OF A FREE SOCIETY.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, your "super vouchers" cannot buy our children. No government can deny parents their God-given rights over their children. (Pierce vs Sisters, 1925)

Are you really requiring parents to waive their rights? Similar to the waivers HR 5 requires of the states?

If so, we demand that you immediately produce the waiver by which parents would sign their children over to the federal government! Explain that one to God... and your own grandchildren.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, "The family is the primary society. It does not exist by sufferance of the state." (Dr. Charles E. Rice, correspondence February 5, 1996.)

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, if you care about a free America, you must stop HR 5.

Our children are not "mere creatures of the state."

(Pierce vs. Sisters, 1925)

Sunday, February 15, 2015

When Is An Apple, NOT An Apple?

GMOs invade fruit industry: Apples, pears, cherries and peaches to all become unlabeled GMO

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Genetically modified apples have been approved by the industry-corrupted USDA, a federal regulator that accomplishes for the biotech industry the same thing the FDA achieves for Big Pharma: unlimited profits, lax regulation and a ready willingness to accept fabricated "science" as fact.

"The USDA's environmental review received 73,000 comments that overwhelmingly opposed the commercialization of Arctic Apples," explains a press release from Food & Water Watch. [1]

The GMO apple that just received approval was developed by the Okanagan Specialty Fruits company, which says it "...married the best of nature with the best of science."

The road to Hell, of course, is paved with the best of intentions, and that's the problem with all these GMOs: Modern science is rolling the dice with a self-replicating "genetic pollution" scenario that could play out in ways that no scientist ever anticipated. As the Food & Water Watch press release explains:

The USDA has neglected to look at the full range of risks from these apples. In its environmental assessment, the USDA glossed over the possibility of unintentional effects associated with the technology used to engineer these apples, potential economic impacts on the U.S. and international apple market, effects of potential contamination for non-GMO and organic apple growers and the impact of the non-browning gene silencing which also can weaken plant defenses and plant health.

In addition to genetically modified apples, the Okanagan Specialty Fruits company also promises to roll out genetically modified peaches, cherries and pears. [3- See full article link below for the resource link]

Suppression of the PPO gene may lead to less nutritious fruits

To achieve its GMO apples, the Okanagan fruit company has developed a way to reduce the natural browning of apples that takes place after they are sliced. This is accomplished by genetically suppressing the polyphenol oxidase (PPO) gene.

What's wrong with playing around with the PPO gene? Suppressing this gene may have unintended consequences such as reducing the fruit's nutritional polyphenols (natural medicinal compounds). Thus, this genetic alteration of the apple might strip from the apple many of its health-promoting qualities. Yes, the apple would still physically resemble a normal, natural apple, but it would be genetically lacking the very thing that has long contributed to the truism, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away."

But an apple from Okanagan might keep the nutrients away, feeding you what I call "shadow food" that looks like real food but is lacking the nutrients of real food.

I'm not talking about macronutrients like magnesium, calcium, fiber and sugars. Those will all be present in identical quantities: I'm talking about the medicinal phytochemicals such as the very polyphenols that give apples some measure of medicinal value.

Read about medicinal polyphenols at this Life Extension web page which explains the valuable medicinal roles of apple polyphenols such as phloridzin.

This page on WHfoods.com also covers many of the apple's polyphenol nutrients, revealing their anti-cancer, anti-diabetes and anti-heart disease properties.

Food & Water Watch adds:

The particular gene targeted by this technology allows the apples to be sliced without turning brown, which could mislead consumers into thinking they are eating fresh apples when they might be eating apples on the verge of rotting. Browning is an important indicator to consumers in determining the freshness of an apple or apple slice. The silenced gene is also heavily involved in a plant's natural defense against pests and pathogens, which could lead to trees that are less healthy than non-GMO apples and rely on more chemical treatments to ward off pests and disease.

It's not difficult to see that if the genetic modification of fruits is allowed to invade the food supply with pears, cherries, oranges, bananas, peaches and more, we may end up with a fruit industry feeding Americans "shadow foods" that look misleadingly healthy when they really aren't.

Will this apple company resort to the same shameless tactics of slander, defamation and character assassination used by the U.S. biotech industry?

It's too early to tell whether the Okanagan Specialty Fruits company is going to attempt the same sort of despicable tactics against health-conscious consumers, reporters and health advocates, but the company's founder, Neal Carter, insists biotechnology is "the next frontier." He also claims, in utter ignorance of an extraordinary amount of scientific research on GMOs and glyphosate, that "There is no scientific evidence that the risks associated with biotechnology are any greater than those of traditional methods of breeding and selection." [2- See full article link below for the resource link]

Yawn. It sounds like the same sort of denialist drivel you'd find on Wikipedia, a disinfo hub dominated by editorial trolls on the payroll of biotech and pharma companies whose job is to trash the reputations of truth-telling journalists, bloggers and authors.

Neal Carter has already stated he is opposed to honest labeling of his company's apples as GMO. According to the New York Times, "Mr. Carter said apples would be labeled as Arctic, with links to the company's website, so consumers could figure out that the fruit was engineered. But he said that labeling the fruit as genetically modified would only be 'demonizing' it." [4- See full article link below for the resource link]

In other words, Carter is already opposed to the honest GMO labeling of his genetically modified fruits. He only wants to label the GMO apples "Arctic," and then claim that the brand name is enough because people can go online and do their own research to find out the apples are genetically modified. The rationalization of all this is patently absurd. The word "Arctic" does not mean "GMO" in the minds of consumers. Not yet, anyway.

The fact that all these biotech people think they're saviors to the food industry -- yet they refuse to support consumer choice through honest labeling -- further demonstrates the ethical lapses that are almost universal in biotech today. Then again, you really have to be a horrible person in the first place to profit from creating the risk of runaway genetic pollution that might theoretically damage all the world's fruits crops in unforeseeable ways.

That's the moniker of biotech: No risk to Mother Nature over the next century is too large to make another buck today.

U.S. apple industry to suffer as a result of non-labeled GMO apples

The refusal to label genetically modified apples in a clear manner will, of course, damage consumer trust in ALL apples.

The U.S. Apple Association has already begun to side with the GMO industry. As the New York Times reports:

"That clear identification of the Arctic brand will help consumers make clear, informed choices if Okanagan apples do become available in stores in a few years," Wendy Brannen, director of consumer health and public relations for the U.S. Apple Association, said in an email.

That's only a half-truth, of course. The clear identification of the Arctic brand is not at all a clear indication of GMO status. Once news of GMO apples begins to spread, many consumers will not be aware of (or not remember) which brand is GMO, so they will simply shun all apples and choose some other fruit instead.

If I were a non-GMO apple producer, I'd be pretty worried about the market consequences of a non-labeled genetically modified apple entering the marketplace, potentially ruining the reputation of all apples.

Word of GMO apples will spread like wildfire across food-conscious consumers, of course. It is the unlabeled GMO status that has largely ruined the reputation of soy and canola oil over the last few years, and food companies experiencing the most growth are those who are openly touting Non-GMO Project Verified status and sourcing non-GMO ingredients.

If the word "apple" raises a big question mark in the minds of consumers, then you're going to see plummeting sales of:

* fresh apples
* apple sauce
* apple juice
* apple pies
* apple snacks

The only way to prevent this from happening is to require honest GMO labeling of all foods so that consumers can make an informed choice. With honest labeling, you restore a free market approach that allows consumers to support the companies they wish to promote.

That's why all efforts to block GMO labeling are anti-choice, anti-free-market and anti-consumer rights.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE

Monday, February 9, 2015

Integrative Medicine - Preventive & Wellness Health Care

Click on picture above to visit ACAM

The American College for Advancement in Medicine (ACAM) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to educating physicians and other health care professionals on the safe and effective application of integrative medicine. ACAM's healthcare model focuses on prevention of illness and a strive for total wellness.

What is integrative medicine?

Integrative medicine is healing-oriented medicine that takes account of the whole person (body, mind, and spirit), including all aspects of lifestyle. It emphasizes the therapeutic relationship and makes use of all appropriate therapies, both conventional and alternative.

**************************

So...I thought that doctors are SUPPOSED to be taught this anyways! Guess not! So, imagine that. A place that teaches PREVENTIVE medicine that strives for TOTAL wellness using BOTH conventional AND alternative therapies! Hmmmm...sounds like something that SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE in the first place to me!!!!

National Geographic -Marijuana Cannabis Research Studies

So tell me again WHY this awesome medicine is STILL illegal in the USA? Can you say...BIG PHARMA CORPORATE GREED?
It doesn't matter about the Americans' health and lives, just as long as BIG PHARMA makes HUGE PROFITS!