TAKE ACTION: Stop the Nazi medical tyranny in Oregon and Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward

This is a question by THIS writer:

Is it a coincidence that one of Senator Haywood's name is a GERMAN name (Steiner) and that she is promoting Nazi-like medical tyranny?
****************************************
 by Mike Adams, Health Ranger - NaturalNews.com

Oregon state senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward calls for government to physically violate children by force with vaccine mandate echoing Nazi crimes against humanity

Oregonians are about to find themselves living in a bona fide medical police state if State Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward gets her way. She's spearheading changes to state law that would eliminate philosophical and religious exemptions for vaccines, thereby forcing all parents to have their children physically violated with extremely toxic substances still used in vaccines: mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and monosodium glutamate -- all still used in vaccines as openly admitted by the CDC.

Nazi fascism is deeply rooted in the belief that the state owns your body -- a belief now shared by Sen. Steiner Hayward. Under the banner of "science," Nazi scientists readily endorsed all the following "medical science" policies while claiming they were all necessary for the "greater good of society."

• Forced killings of the physically handicapped
• Forced euthanasia of the elderly
• Mass killings of people suffering from chronic disease
• Forced sterilization of the mentally retarded
• Forced gassing to death of those deemed "genetically inferior" by scientists

See Nazi public health propaganda posters here.

Nazi science is alive and well in America today, thanks to people like Steiner Hayward

All of these wildly unethical, human-rights-violating programs were spearhead by people who invoked the exact same logic and abandonment of morality now demonstrated by Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is not just willing to skirt the boundaries of medical ethics and human rights, she is thrilled to obliterate that line in her zeal to achieve a government-enforced medical dictatorship over your private body.

Once that line is destroyed, there's no stopping where it goes: mandatory organ harvesting "for the greater good." Mandatory abortions of genetically "inferior" babies (with forced government DNA testing of your baby required by law). Government revocation of your reproductive "rights" if your own health does not meet the government's strict standards. (GATTACA) Oregon state death panels that demand everyone be euthanized at age 65 to save the state money on Medicaid... there's no end to the horrors of a government that has zero respect for human dignity and medical freedom.

If you've ever wondered how a group of the world's most brilliant scientists once marched the world's most scientifically advanced nation (Germany) down the path of genocide and mass death, look no further than the schemes and words of Oregon state Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is the poster child for the kind of medical tyranny that has already lead straight to genocide once before in human history. Who will take a stand and stop Steiner Hayward from repeating that dark chapter of history with the citizens of the state of Oregon?

What's most astonishing to me is to think back about how many courageous American men and women lost their lives in World War II in order to defeat Nazi tyranny and bring down a government regime that has spiraled out of control, placing everyone's liberty and safety at risk. Now people like Steiner Hayward are frantically trying to bring back that same tyranny -- and she's in a position of power to make it happen unless the People of Oregon stop her.

Click here to see my recent comparison of America's modern-day vaccine propaganda with Nazi-era eugenics propaganda. The similarities are beyond eerie...

Not only should Steiner Hayward's medical police state actions be utterly rejected by the public; she should be recalled from public office by the People of Oregon for daring to pursue the agenda of quack science vaccine lunatics who are nothing short of mentally ill for wanting to physically violate the bodies of children with the toxic chemicals still used in vaccines today.

Tell this out-of-control Oregon legislator to keep her needles away from our children!

It's time to let your voice be heard and tell these tyrannical, out-of-control legislators to keep their needles away from our children!

92% of Americans reject vaccine tyranny

The public is fed up with medical tyranny, and both the entire medical profession and the mainstream media have lost tremendous credibility over this contrived, wholly fabricated vaccine propaganda scheme. Even USA Today, which recently published a column calling for the arrest and imprisonment of "anti-vaxxers," recently hosted a public poll asking whether Americans should be forced to be vaccinated against their will.

The public response? 92% of people REJECTED mandatory vaccines:



Even the American Medical Association is openly opposed to mandatory vaccines. Its own Code of Ethics guidelines clearly establish the principle of "informed consent" for all medical procedures, stating that doctors who fail to respect their patients' decisions are operating in total violation of established medical ethics.

Here's the full statement from the AMA's Code of Ethics page, section 8.08 - Informed Consent:

The patient's right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient's care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice. The physician has an ethical obligation to help the patient make choices from among the therapeutic alternatives consistent with good medical practice. Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent. In special circumstances, it may be appropriate to postpone disclosure of information, (see Opinion E-8.122, "Withholding Information from Patients").

Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients. The quantity and specificity of this information should be tailored to meet the preferences and needs of individual patients. Physicians need not communicate all information at one time, but should assess the amount of information that patients are capable of receiving at a given time and present the remainder when appropriate. (I, II, V, VIII)

It is astonishing that Sen. Steiner Hayward now wants to make the violation of the AMA's medical ethics a routine feature of Oregon state law!

TAKE ACTION: Stop the Nazi medical tyranny in Oregon

From Health Impact News:

There is another public hearing scheduled on SB 442 for March 9, 2015. If you would like to tell Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward how you feel about this bill, here is how to contact her:

Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward
Democrat -- District 17 -- NW Portland/Beaverton
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1717
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-215, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ElizabethSteinerHayward@state.or.us
Website: http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/steinerhayw...

Other members of the Senate Committee on Health Care:

Senator Chip Shields
Democrat -- District 22 -- Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1722 District Phone: 503-231-2564
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-421, Salem, Oregon 97301
District Address: 2104 NE 45th Ave., Portland, OR 97213
Email: Sen.ChipShields@state.or.us
Website: http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/shieldsc

Senator Laurie Monnes Anderson
Democrat -- District 25 -- Gresham
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1725
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-413, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.LaurieMonnesAnderson@state.or.us
Website: http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/monnesander...

More news on Elizabeth Steiner Hayward

Monsanto: The world's poster child for corporate manipulation and deceit

Extreme bias at Wikipedia on homeopathic medicine

Guatemalan STD medical experiments were just one crime in a long history of medical-government collusion to use humans as guinea pigs

131 Ways for an Infant to Die: Vaccines and Sudden Death

NaturalNews exclusive: Michigan government unleashes armed raids on small pig farmers, forces farmer to shoot all his own pigs

Magnesium crucial to prevent congestive heart failure

The epidemic of medical child abuse - and what can be done about it

When MEDICINE becomes MURDER

 by Mike Adams, Health Ranger - NaturalNews.com

With each passing day as vaccine fanaticism spreads like a virus of the mind across the mainstream media, America is marching down the path of genocide and heinous human rights violations in the name of "SCIENCE!"

The very arguments used by today's vaccine pushers to claim that the government should force everyone to be vaccinated against their will closely resemble the eugenics justifications of Nazi Germany.

The collection of Nazi propaganda posters you see below has been translated by Natural News in order to show the parallels between Nazi crimes against humanity and today's fanatical vaccine mandate schemes that are based on very similar moral justification and distorted logic.

Today, people like Oregon State Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward are marching America down the path of Nazi Germany, using the exact same arguments and attempted moral justifications that were once invoked by Adolf Hitler.

Nazi propaganda poster: The Ideal Man

Along with policies of forced euthanasia, sterilization, organ harvesting and medical experimentation, the "science" Nazi regime attempted to use positive imagery to claim it was creating a better society.

The following Nazi poster shows the "ideal man and woman" as desired by the state:



In Pennsylvania, a similar poster promotes vaccines with an attempt at patriotism, saying you "Earn your stripe!" when you get vaccinated:

German poster advocating the forced euthanasia of the physically handicapped

This propaganda poster explains that diseased and physically handicapped people are a financial burden on the state. Therefore, the thinking goes, they should all be euthanized for the "greater good."

This is the same "greater good" logic now invoked by vaccine pushers in America who believe it is morally justified to harm and kill some children with vaccines because the policy serves the interests of the state:

A congenitally diseased or handicapped person costs the government 5.5 Reichsmark daily.

For 5.5 Reichsmark a healthy, sound family can live a full day of life.



This flu shot poster in the United States argues that flu shots "save lives," glossing over the reality that flu shots still contain mercury, a potent neurotoxic heavy metal that causes permanent brain damage:

Kill the mentally ill negros

This Nazi poster complains about the cost of the government providing care for a "mentally ill negro" who has been institutionalized for 16 years.

As with all the other posters shown here, the argument is that killing people like this negro is "good for society!" It's the same argument used with forced vaccinations, forced organ harvesting and the government's health care "death panels" in America today.

Mentally ill negro (English citizen)
16 years in an institution
RM 35,000 in costs

CDC commits scientific fraud to bury autism risk affecting African-Americans

In the United States, top CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson openly admitted that the CDC committed scientific fraud to bury data linking vaccines to autism in African-American boys.

As this truth emerged, the CDC went to extraordinary lengths to censor the story, and the entire mainstream media was ordered by the U.S. government to blackball the confession and avoid any mention of it. To this day, the confession of the CDC whistleblower remains the most heavily censored medical story in U.S. history.

Just like in Nazi Germany, America's medical system utterly abandons people of dark skin color, considering them "not worth saving." Medicine in America today is not just murder; it's also genocide.

Granny is next, too. Here's a real cover for Newsweek, announcing, "The Case for Killing Granny." The article argued that the U.S. government needed to save money by killing off the elderly:

Moral justification for the mass killing of the physically handicapped

This next poster argues for the forced killing of the physically handicapped by announcing how much money such people cost the state in health care expenses.

The message informs the people of Germany that their money is being wasted on handicapped citizens, implying that killing off those people creates a better society.

This congenitally handicapped person costs the nation, as a whole, 60,000 Reichsmark over a lifetime.

People this is your money.

Read Neuses Volk ("New People")

The monthly newsletter of the racially correct political bureau of the NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party)



This TIME Magazine issue argued that the elderly in America should be murdered by removing their feeding tubes as they lay in their hospital beds:

Murdering children in the name of God

This next poster invokes God, claiming that even God would not want sick or handicapped people to reproduce.

Therefore, the logic goes, it is the "will of God" that the state murder these "undesirables." This is based on the belief that the state owns the people -- the very same idea now being aggressively pushed in America by vaccine fanatics who think the government has the right to force medical interventions on people against their wishes.

God cannot intend that the sick and infirmed propagate or reproduce sickness and infirmity (physical or mental weakness).

Worthless people are multiplying faster!

This poster explains how "worthless people" are multiplying faster than the healthy population. This includes the physically handicapped and mentally ill.

The Nazi war on handicapped people mirrors today's mainstream media war against so-called "anti-vaxxers" who happen to be among the most well-informed people in the world on health issues.

In order for any government to imprison or murder large numbers of people, it must first label them as a burden on society:

Those worth less are multiplying faster than the healthy population!

Number of pregnancies of mothers who had mentally ill children in school for the mentally disabled...
... the average mother in the city [is] concerned

Euthanasia candidates

This is a picture of children who are candidates for euthanasia. In America today, unvaccinated children are being labeled using the same derogatory language (even though most unvaccinated children are, in reality, far more intelligent and far healthier than vaccinated children).

Euthanasia victims vs. vaccine victims

In Nazi Germany, victims of birth deformities were frequently slated for euthanasia by the state.

In America today, victims of vaccine damage are utterly abandoned by the state, forgotten by the CDC and lying legislators like Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Here's an image of Germany's physically handicapped, scheduled for euthanasia:



And here are some images of American children damaged by vaccines -- who are then entirely abandoned by doctors, the media and lawmakers:

Neurologically damaged by the DPT vaccine:



Extreme tissue damage caused by vaccines:



The HPV vaccine turned this normal, healthy girl into a brain-damaged victim of vaccines:



Another severe skin reaction following vaccination:

Hitler orders health authorities to find more people to euthanize the terminally ill

Under a medical police state system -- which is precisely what is now being constructed in Oregon, California and many other states across America -- the state can determine when to kill you. The state owns your body, after all, and that precedent was already established when the people refused to resist vaccine mandates.

On Sep. 1, 1939, Adolf Hitler ordered Germany's medical doctors to recruit more people who would name people to be euthanized against their will.

Included on this list for euthanasia targets were people with cancer, physical handicaps, liver disorders and other health challenges:

Letter from Adolf Hitler
Berlin Sept. 1, 1939

To the Reichsleiter (leader) Bouhler and Dr. Brandt (a Medical Dr.):

They have the responsibility to increase the authority of individuals who will be named to evaluate the terminally ill to determine whether euthanasia can be performed...

Forced sterilization of the innocent

This Nazi propaganda poster argued that Germany's forced euthanasia and sterilization policies were morally justified because other countries were doing the same thing.

In fact, there was "scientific consensus" at the time that any government could order the murder of handicapped, retarded or chronically ill citizens. Government-sponsored murder was justified under the same "greater good" logic used by vaccine pushers in America today:

We do not stand alone

In these countries similar laws exist: USA Denmark Norway Sweden Finland
The following countries are considering similar protection: Hungary England Switzerland [illegible]

Law for the Prevention of Offspring with Hereditary Diseases from 7/14/33

Mentally handicapped people are costing you a lot of money, so let's kill them all

This poster insists that mentally handicapped people should be killed because they are placing a burden on society.

You are sharing the load

A person with a hereditary disease costs on average RM 50,000 by the time they reach their 60th birthday.

More news on vaccine propaganda

NaturalNews exclusive: International Medical Council on Vaccination refutes vaccine propaganda with myth-busting report

Media parades dead children as victims of anti-vaxxers despite medical facts contradicting the narrative

Evidence-based vaccinations: A scientific look at the missing science behind flu season vaccines

BACKFIRE: How the vaccine industry lost the propaganda war, alienated the public and stirred up suspicion of the entire medical profession

Flu shot hoax admitted: "No controlled trials demonstrating a decrease in influenza"

Why is Australia's vaccine mafia desperately trying to silence this brilliant scientific researcher?

Shock vaccine study reveals influenza vaccines only prevent the flu in 1.5 out of 100 adults (not 60% as you've been told)

Tell Congress to Put an Expiration Date on Unconstitutional Bulk Surveillance

Key parts of the Patriot Act expire soon -- so we have a new opportunity to push back against ongoing, illegal, mass surveillance of Americans.

Will you join our coalition effort demanding that Congress put an end to mass spying?
The government has used the Patriot Act to claim enormous new powers to spy on all of us -- and has lied about it with impunity.

It's gone too far, but this spring, key provisions of the Patriot Act are set to expire – including one that the NSA claims lets it collect private data about all of our phone calls.
It's illegal and ineffective, and it must STOP.

This spying is so offensive that the original sponsor of the Patriot Act, Representative Jim Sensenbrenner, is urging colleagues to sign a letter asserting that they will vote against reauthorization if the law is not amended to ban mass surveillance.

More signatures on the letter mean more power for us and our allies as the Patriot Act approaches its sunset.
Will you click here to urge your lawmakers to sign it the letter?  It'll just take a second, and will strengthen our position as we approach the Patriot Act expiration.

We've come close to reining in the NSA several times -- with your help, we can win this one.
Click here to join us and our partners as we tell Congress that we can't allow unconstitutional mass surveillance of Americans to continue. 

-Watchdog.net

Stop Obama's Plan To Tax and Control The Internet Before 02/26/15!

The FCC will vote this Thursday, February 26th, on Obama's plan to tax and censor the internet.
The FCC is a five-member panel with 3 Democrats and 2 Republicans, so we already know that this rigged vote will fall in favor of Obama's so-called "Net Neutrality" plan.
The only way that you can stop Obama from taxing your internet use and shutting down your favorite conservative Christian websites through censorship is by convincing Congress to intervene.
HR 279 is a bill that would limit the FCC's (and Obama's) authority over broadband internet service providers. This bill does an end-run around Obama's entire 332-page secret plan to control the internet.
The bill will allow the Congress, representing "we the people," to keep the internet open and free as it has been for years, rather than allowing Obama to seize control of the web through a regulatory agency.
Call - (202) 225-2927 and/or fax - (202) 225-1919 the House Energy & Commerce Committee and your US House Representatives today and demand that they pass HR 279 immediately! (See bottom of post for an example fax/statement).

We are running out of time before this Thursday vote in the FCC, so you must take action quickly.
Obama is trying to reclassify the internet as a public utility under the Communications Act of 1934.
That original Act was drafted based on shipping regulations that the federal government used in the 1800s. How can these rules possibly apply in a fair manner to 21st century technology such as the internet?
If these rules pass, Obama will have the authority to tax your internet use. Through regulations from the FCC (and soon the FEC, the Federal Elections Commission), he will be able to shut down conservative and Christian websites, everything from the Drudge Report to Pray For US.
This fight is the greatest threat to freedom of speech that America has ever seen!
HR 279 would amend the Communications Act of 1934 so that the FCC cannot tamper with internet service providers as if they are telephone companies.
The internet is an INFORMATION service, not a COMMUNICATIONS service, as Obama and the FCC are trying to claim, and HR 279 will set this in stone.
Tell the House of Representatives to pass Bob Latta's HR 279 immediately to protect the internet from Obama's wishes to be a dictator!
John 3:20 in the Bible tells us, "For every one that does evil hates the light, and will not come to the light, otherwise his deeds would be reproved."
If Obama's plan to impose "net neutrality" is so good for the internet, then why is no one outside of the FCC allowed to see this secret plan before it is passed?
The answer is, Obama's plan is evil. It will crush freedom of speech and will prevent elderly people on fixed incomes from being able to afford the internet. Obama's plan is evil, through and through.
You must speak out immediately and demand that Congress stop Obama's dictatorial internet grab, by passing HR 279 at once!

Calling Obama a dictator on this issue is not an exaggeration. In fact, former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell says that foreign dictators LOVE Obama's net neutrality plan. Obama is trying to control the internet in the same way that foreign dictators do:  Regulation, taxation and censorship!
Send your demands to stop him right now.

Then, please warn others about this issue, because the mainstream media has completely ignored the fact that Obama is about to tax and censor the internet. Share this info with everyone among your family members, friends and acquaintances who wants to keep the internet open and free.

Sincerely,
Charles Benninghoff, Founder
Pray For US
2360 Corporate Circle, Suite 400
Henderson, Nevada 89074-7722
https://PrayFor.US/150220_31113_p4us_pp_Obama_Internet_Grab_Coming/
**********************************************************************
Example fax/statement:

Your First Name Last Name
Address
City, State Zip

Fred Upton
2183 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairman Upton:

Obama's secret 332-page plan to regulate, tax and censor the internet under the guise of "Net Neutrality" is the greatest threat to freedom of speech that the United States has ever seen. The fact that Obama is attempting to take over control of the internet through a regulatory agency, rather than trying to do it through a vote of Congress, should tell you all that you need to know about this plan.

From what we know of this secret plan, the FCC will reclassify the internet as a public utility under the Communications Act of 1934. This Act originated from shipping regulations in the 1800s. How can it possibly be applied in a reasonable manner to 21st-century technology?

Furthermore, the Communications Act of 1934 applies to communications services. The internet is not a communication service -- it is an INFORMATION service, which is why the internet has been referred to as an "information super-highway."

You can circumvent Obama's freedom-killing plan to tax and censor the internet by immediately passing HR 279, a bill that would amend the Communications Act of 1934 in order to limit the FCC's ability to meddle with broadband internet service providers.

The internet has been regulation-free for years under bipartisan consensus. Only a truly radical, un-American with a dictator complex would seek to destroy the internet through taxation and censorship. Perhaps that is why one former FCC Commissioner says that foreign dictators love Obama's Net Neutrality scheme.

Do the right thing for America! Pass HR 279 immediately to stop Obama's internet takeover!

Sincerely,

(Your First Name Last Name Here)

States Have Given Up Their Educational Control And Parents' Rights!

ALERT: HR 5, the Student Success Act of 2015

The following information is critically important. It should go viral immediately. Send it to every parent and grandparent, school board member, state legislator, voter, friend.... Post it on Facebook, websites, blogs, etc. Time is very short! This bill is on the FAST TRACK! The vote on H.R. 5 may take place as early as Tuesday Feb. 24. 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Anita B Hoge 724-263-0474
Ryan Bannister 717-919-2122
Gen Yvette Sutton 610-507-9113
Cheryl Boise 412-389-6896
Rich Felice 484-678-2236

Pennsylvanians Restoring Education

Pennsylvanians Against Common Core
February 20, 2015, Harrisburg, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, PA. 

Citizens of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvanians Restoring Education, Pennsylvania Against Common Core, parents and students are asking Representative John Kline to stop theREAUTHORIZATION of ESEA, HR 5, the Student Success Act of 2015 which will amend No Child Left Behind. 

• HR 5 denies parents their rights over their children. Reference pages 488; 522-555.

• HR 5 legislation creates the radical transformation of tax collectionthrough the assigned destruction and hostile takeover of our local neighborhood schools.

• HR 5 violates states' rights under the United States Constitution.

• HR 5 is designed to destroy local, public neighborhood schoolsthrough usurpation of elected school boards' authorities and responsibilities.

• HR 5 will destroy all private education in America, as well, legislating Title I "choice" vouchers that will "follow the child," enforcing HR 5 compliance in EVERY PRIVATE AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOL.

• HR 5 would legislate services to these Title I "choice" children called DIRECT STUDENT SERVICES AS A VOUCHER that must be equitable and comparable to any public school, which is needed to satisfy Common Core.

• HR 5 will destroy representative government, all non-governmental schools, and standardize education across this nation. This overreach of the federal government is in direct violation of our United States Constitution which dictates separation of federal jurisdiction vs. State jurisdiction.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, you state in the Student Success Act HR 5, Press Release, February 3, 2015:

".....This proposal provides an opportunity to chart a new course...."

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, this  "new course" that you are forcing on the states will end in Constitutional chaos.

• HR 5 removes Constitutional states' rights sovereignty.

• HR 5 redefines parent and removes parental rights over the upbringing of their children.

• HR 5 subjugates state legislatures under blatantly false pretenses about state and local control.

• HR 5 presents choice vouchers defined as "direct student services," as a means to control private and religious schools and phase out public schools.

• HR 5 would transform ALL SCHOOLS into government schools. Has every state ceded the land that these schools occupy, turning them into federal lands? If the states have not ceded the land to the federal government, the federal government's jurisdiction is determined to be severely limited, unless altered drastically by the state legislature. Questions of jurisdiction would still remain. At the least, HR 5 obfuscates state and federal jurisdictions as specified in the Constitution and affirmed in numerous Supreme Court decisions.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE Who "Grubered" your HR 5 and consigned the states to federal takeover?

• HR 5 forces private and religious schools to provide services through an APPROVED state list of providers eliminating the freedom for private and religious schools to teach students to their own standards and select their own curriculum.

• HR 5 forces private and religious schools to provide non-cognitive mental health areas of personality development and interventions whereby proficiency levels in the social, emotional, and behavioral domain are scored to a criterion resulting in violations of privacy under the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment, federal law, state law, and civil rights laws.

• HR 5 uses choice vouchers to dissolve the public school system through the exodus  of (departure of) Choice, Title I, at-risk students who disengage from the public school and enter a private or religious school. Public schools are presently represented by locally elected school board members in the United States. The destruction of our neighborhood public school system undermines the power and authority of property tax provisions and elected school board representation on the local level, representation which financially supports local education agencies.

• HR 5 provides for the expansion of charter schools as thesanctioned alternative for schooling.  As you, Representative Kline, must know, charter schools are a system of schooling without elected boards. They use public tax monies regulated by federal government mandates, standards, assessment and teacher remediation with data tracking and trafficking and re-education toward Common Core standards.

• HR 5 by design eliminates local and state representative government by removing the states’ rights and local control of education and surrenders our children's education and future to the dictates of the federal government.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, H.R. 5 is a Constitutional Crisis in the Making. 

• HR 5 requires that states legislatively surrender their rights over education in order to receive Title I funds.

• HR 5 removes the parents as the final arbiters in the upbringing of their children, and wrestles control of private and religious education through federal encroachment as explained below.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, quoting from your HR 5 legislation, on page 552, you stipulate the criteria for removing the state legislature's constitutional power, rights, and responsibilities as follows:

Subpart 4—Restoration of State Sovereignty Over Public Education and Parental Rights Over the Education of Their Children

‘‘SEC. 6561. STATES TO RETAIN RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES

THEY DO NOT EXPRESSLY WAIVE.

‘‘(a) RETENTION OF RIGHTS AND AUTHORITIES.— No officer, employee, or other authority of the Secretary shall enforce against an authority of a State, nor shall any authority of a State have any obligation to obey, any requirement imposed as a condition of receiving assistance under a grant program established under this Act, nor shall such program operate within a State, unless the legislature of that State shall have by law expressly approved that program and, in doing so, HAVE waived the State’s rights and authorities to act inconsistently with any requirement that might be imposed by the Secretary as a condition of receiving that assistance."  (Emphasis added)

"(b) AMENDMENT OF TERMS OF RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

An officer, employee, or other authority of the Secretary may release assistance under a grant program established under this Act to a State only after the legislature of the State has by law expressly approved the program (as described in sub- section (a)). This approval may be accomplished by a vote to affirm a State budget that includes the use of such Federal funds and any such State budget must expressly include any requirement imposed as a condition of receiving assistance under a grant program established under this Act so that by approving the budget, the State legislature is expressly approving the grant program and, in doing so, waiving the State’s rights and authorities to act inconsistently with any requirement that might be imposed by the Secretary as a condition of receiving that assistance."  (Emphasis added)

The passage of your bill out of committee to be voted on by the entire House of Representatives by February 24 must be stopped. The HR 5 Reauthorization of ESEA, amending No Child Left Behind, must be stopped because the provisions inherent in this legislation are egregious and lack Constitutional authority. Passage of H.R. 5 will bring about the destruction of the United States system of public education as well as  the radical transformation of representative government both at the state and local level.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, these states' rights issues have not been discussed at your hearings. Is each state legislature aware of the fact that these measures, hidden in federal and state statute, will remove their state’s guaranteed rights under the Constitution? Will each state, including your own state of Minnesota, have to amend its own state constitution to comply with HR 5?

Several states have recently added language in their state statutes that in effect cedes jurisdiction to the federal government.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, have you advised the following states of the impact of the HR 5 legislation:

Pennsylvania has currently proposed legislation, HB 168, Sec. 121(a) (Representative Tobash), that states it will comply to federal ESEA legislation and future ESEAlegislation:

"The Department of Education shall develop and implement Keystone Exams in [the following subjects:]........as required by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425) or any successor statute." (lines 17, 18, 19 ) (Emphasis added)

Oklahoma, in an effort to stop Common Core, the Oklahoma legislature's passage ofHouse Bill 3399, Sec. 11-103.6a 4 (page 18) with the purpose to remove Common Core Standards, defined in their bill that they would succumb to ESEA federal law:

"Upon the effective date of this act, the State Board of Education shall seek certification from the State Regents for Higher Education that the subject matter standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics which were in place prior to the revisions adopted by the Board in June 2010 are college-and career-ready as defined in the Federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility document issued by the United States Department of Education." (emphasis added)

The Oklahoma legislature codified Common Core through ESEA and gave up its state's rights authority by surrendering education and students to federal control.  

Indiana's supposed departure from Common Core in HB 1427, (Sec. 14.5(a) C, page 9) also surrenders its state's rights in order to comply with federal standards.

"Provides that the state board shall implement educational standards that use the common core standards as the base model for academic standards to the extent necessary to comply with federal standards to receive a Flexibility Waiver." (emphasis added)

South Carolina's bill, H3893, (Sec 3, section 59-18-325, (C)(1) passed to stop Common Core and the Smarter Balanced Test is yet another example of a state surrendering its state's rights over education and students to the federal government. In  fact this law restores Common Core:

"The summative assessment must assess students in English/language arts and mathematics, including those students as required by the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and by Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. [For purposes of this subsection, 'English/language arts' includes English, reading, and writing skills as required by existing state standards." [NOTE: The existing State standards are Common Core.] (emphasis added)

The state of Washington is yet another example. Reference Senate Bill 6030, (Sec 6, (4)(a) page 16, lines 17-20):

"..and shall not conflict with requirements contained in Title I of the federal elementary and secondary education act of 1965, or the requirements of the Carl D. Perkins vocational education 20 act of 1998, each as amended." (Emphasis added)

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, have these states been apprised of the devious design in HR 5 to take away states' rights granted under the 10th Amendment to the Constitution?

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, why have your hearings not discussed the aspect of the "direct student services" that is defined as PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE FOR ALL PRIVATE AND RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS? Why have these services not been discussed... services that each private and religious school MUST "provide on an equitable basis" to meet the individual needs of each child who receives a SUPER VOUCHER?  Why does the state require that private or religious schools MUST use "approved academic tutoring services as determined by a provider on a State approved list"? Schools will be subjected to discrimination charges if they deny matriculation of a Title I child even if they cannot financially support the OPEN-ENDED direct services mandated in HR 5, as explained below -- even if it bankrupts them. 

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, why is "meaningful choice" defined as complying to state standards (Common Core) and interventions identified for each "at-risk" child receiving the following services: Special Education, instructional support services, counseling, mentoring, one-to-one tutoring, and other benefits for the Title I child? Why is there wording that mandates that a private or religious school MUST comply with the Civil Rights Act, (the school cannot deny admittance to a Title I choice child) 504Rehabilitation Act, Americans with Disabilities Act, (MUST administer services for mental health disabilities), IDEA (MUST administer behavioral screening, response to interventions, positive behavioral interventions and supports, mental health wrap-around, BILLABLE MEDICAID SERVICES, mental health services or specialized student support services), General Education Provisions Act (GEPA).

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, you know full well that HR 5 will codify  the Family Education Rights in Privacy Act (FERPA). This important Act, as it stands now, has been totally gutted due to President Obama’s Executive Order, EO 12866, January, 2012.  FERPA now allows personally identifiable information on the student to be released without informed written parental consent. This personally identifiable information on the students includes anecdotal, psychological observations, analysis, and reeducation interventions in the affective domain by teachers, all tracked and trafficked.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, why must private and religious schools provide the following specialized Instructional support on an equitable basis with public school students?

Services defined as school counselors, social workers, school psychologists, or other qualified professional personnel providing assessment, diagnosis, counseling education, therapeutic  and other necessary services defined in Sec. 602 IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, when in fact Common Core has been expanded into the mental health personal trait standards defined as social, emotional, and behavioral weaknesses now coded as a disability?

The State Education Agency names an ombudsman, "an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration, especially that of public authorities,"  for the following equitable services in each private and religious school: monitoring and enforcement requirements of private and religious schools, including reeducation in the affective domain. Obviously, under HR 5 the SEA will operate independently with no accountability to the state legislature which has surrendered its authority and responsibility over education and the students.

Referring to the concept of Title I funds that will "follow the child" and the super voucher called "direct student services”:  the Title I fund that "follows the child" is going directly to every child, bypassing state government.  No one at the public hearings explained that CHOICE, TITLE I FUNDS "FOLLOWING THE 'at-risk' CHILD" would be used to destroy the financial base of public schools which have elected school boards and are funded by local tax dollars. HR 5 is purposely designed to destroy the traditional public school system.

Furthermore, REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, there are scores of pages in your ESEAlegislation that would expand CHARTER SCHOOLS OPERATING WITHOUT BOARDS ELECTED BY THE TAXPAYERS AS THEIR REPRESENTATIVES. THIS IS A SET UP FOR CHARTER SCHOOL TAKEOVER OF ALL EDUCATION with charter school authorizers to control private and religious schools. Yet, no one explained HOW these Title I funds "following" a CHOICE, TITLE I "at risk" CHILD will impact the intrusion into private and religious schools, which will be forced into all of the mandates that come with Common Core implementation and EVERY CHILD identified and funded through Title I and thereby subverting the mission of the private and religious school. 

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, you have crafted HR 5 behind closed doors and put it on the fast track to correspond to the "spitball" known as the ESEA Reauthorization.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, your HR 5 merged with the Senate version of ESEA REAUTHORIZATION will NATIONALIZE EDUCATION BYPASSING LOCAL CONTROL AND STATE CONTROL, ELIMINATING LOCAL REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT, THE HALLMARK OF A FREE SOCIETY.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, your "super vouchers" cannot buy our children. No government can deny parents their God-given rights over their children. (Pierce vs Sisters, 1925) 

Are you really requiring parents to waive their rights? Similar to the waivers HR 5 requires of the states? 

If so, we demand that you immediately produce the waiver by which parents would sign their children over to the federal government! Explain that one to God... and your own grandchildren.

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, "The family is the primary society. It does not exist by sufferance of the state."  (Dr. Charles E. Rice, correspondence February 5, 1996.)

REPRESENTATIVE KLINE, if you care about a free America,  you must stop HR 5.

Our children are not "mere creatures of the state."

(Pierce vs. Sisters, 1925)