Saturday, October 17, 2015

Making A Killing: The Untold Story Of Psychotropic Drugging

Americans, Do You Get That Your Government Is Inept Yet?

I still can't fathom yet exactly WHY MOST Americans do not see exactly how inept our federal government (and state governments) really is/are! (For an example of MY state government's ineptness please see my post "Maine Passes Law To Follow The US Constitution".)

There are a plethora of examples during the past three administrations alone that show how inept our government is (also how corrupt it is!), that have been reported on by many writers, journalists and bloggers worldwide . But I am writing here today about the most recent example to put my assertion of governmental ineptness into present context, so that it will be seen more relevant to those who pooh-hooh that the US Government is anything less than absolutely correct, competent, having integrity and does the right thing!

 This most recent example being Russia's president, Vladimir Putin's bombing strikes to eradicate terrorist targets in Syria. Why is this an example of our government's ineptness, you may ask? Glad you asked, because here is the answer:
The US Government's agenda in Syria is to remove Assad. But, they don't want to be DIRECTLY responsible for doing so in the WORLD'S view but most importantly, in the American peoples' view. So what do they do but help arm various rebel forces within Syria who are trying to accomplish the same agenda. Even though that means to be arming ISIS/ISIL, the very terrorist group of whom the US government has declared war upon! So naturally, bombing these jihadist groups would be contrary to the US government's agenda and is why the American "War on Terrorism" is taking longer than necessary to be accomplished and why it seems to not be going anywhere! (But also due to the fact that there actually is no "War on Terrorism" anyways!) The ONLY people that the US government are fooling about this situation and their DIRECT involvement and true agenda seems to be the gullible, uninformed and ignorant American sheeple (which seems to be quite allot of them)!

But Putin's, along with Iran's, agenda is the opposite. They want to keep Assad in place. So, they go and bomb the jihadists and guess what? It has them running! Of course it does, as the jihadists don't really want to die, they just want to control things. But that's kinda hard to do when ALL of them are dead. So, they flee the areas that get bombed and thus not only have less members to help them achieve their goals because of the bombings killing them, but have less safe places to be to organize and carry out their missions. Which is doing exactly what the US government states its objectives are and that's to eradicate terrorism! And because of most Americans' ignorance on what their own government's agenda is and what they've actually been doing, Putin can now use this to state propaganda that he (thus Russia) is much smarter and stronger than the US and is accomplishing what the US cannot do...get rid of the terrorists of which the US says they have declared war upon.

When the exact opposite is true. American forces could have (and CAN) within just a matter of days, eliminate these terrorists into oblivion! But then that would mean that they would also have to eliminate Assad as well. And Lord forbid, that the US government be DIRECTLY linked to doing that! Because then, their TRUE agenda will be exposed without a doubt, to the American public and then would have to answer to the same! They would also have to answer some very serious (and nasty) questions like:

  1. How come you lied to us and said that the "War on Terrorism" is so dire that it scared allot of Americans into giving up some of our liberties in exchange for being safe, when you actually was aiding and abetting the same terrorists causing this terrorism?
  2. How come you actually aided and abetted and furthered these terrorists' agenda by giving them military support and arms and thus committing war crimes just as atrocious as the jihadists themselves?
  3. How come you helped to arm the very terrorists that, if after they actually did accomplish ousting Assad, we would then have to fight to win the "War on Terrorism" that you claim exists, thus fighting against our own weaponry and war strategies?
  4. How come you decided to do this which makes us look weak, ineffective and like terrorists ourselves and then not only lie to us about what you're truly doing and your true agenda, but also pitting the rest of the world against us because they think that us Americans actually support and condone these actions? When in truth, most Americans have no clue to this because our mainstream media outlets are owned and directed by the very people who are behind, support and help further this agenda and won't report the real truth and only reports propaganda that the US government/elites wants its people to know?
Of course the jihadists won't/don't run FROM us, because they know who's in bed with them and who their supporters are! And why would you run from them? The jihadists are doing what anyone in their position would do, and that's to accept the support and weapons while still hating them and plotting against them and actually killing them. Why not, if these supporters are stupid enough to help them do it, why look a gift horse in the mouth?

And Putin is doing what anyone in his position would do as well. Why not take advantage to further your own position and agenda while also using this advantage to cast aspersions upon one of your long standing foes/enemies and make them look like weak and ineffective idiots?

NOW do you see what I mean by our government is inept? We have so called "leaders" running this great nation into the ground and ruining what was once a great example to the world on how to be a Republic of, by and for a free people. And We the People are really to blame for all of this because we have become lax in our duty to stand ever vigilant in guarding our freedoms that our forefathers so bravely gave us through much trial and sacrifices and sometimes with their very lives 239 years ago and hold our elected officials accountable for their ineptness and treasonist actions. So, if our great nation becomes no longer relevant on the world's stage, no longer a great beacon of truth, right and a safe haven against tyranny, then we only have ourselves to blame!

Hang the Bankers

The Washington Post

The Guardian

RT - Question More


The Guardian

Ben Swann Truth in Media

Truth In Media

Maine Passes Law To Follow The US Constitution

I really find this not only odd, but down right unnecessary and shows us, "We the People" exactly how far gone our government is at ALL levels and has absolutely no idea of what they are doing and has also no comprehension of what the US Constitution and their own state constitutions say or mean!

Don't get me wrong as I think it's a GREAT thing that Maine has finally decided to follow the US Constitution and agree that our 2nd Amendment right to bearing arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED upon! But the very fact that a BILL had to be brought forth, voted on and then passed into law to accomplish this is just mind boggling to me! IMHO...the LAW that restricted it in the 1st place which was UNCONSTITUTIONAL to begin with, should have been removed...PERIOD! Why bring forth yet ANOTHER bill to force our state government to do what they should have been doing ALL ALONG, which is to FOLLOW THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND....the US Constitution? 

WHY do our legislators not get that they do NOT have to write and pass bills giving us, We the People, the right to have the right to bear arms (without infringement) that is ALREADY given us, BY US, through the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution and then additionally strengthened and given to us in our STATE constitution, Article I (Declaration of Rights), Section 16: To keep and bear arms. Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned? I'm glad that our legislators WANT to follow our constitutions and thus providing We the People with what is unalienably our right to possess, but it seems that they need to be educated more that these rights do NOT need to be readdressed legislatively by passing bills and making new law. That instead, it needs to be addressed through REMOVING the unconstitutional law that INFRINGED upon our unalienable right in the first place! Because make no mistake in knowing this, NO LAW PASSED THAT IS CONTRARY TO THE US CONSTITUTION IS LEGAL ANYWAYS*! No law that is in opposition to what is stated in our US Constitution can hold ANY lawfulness...PERIOD! If anyone wants to AMEND ANY constitutional amendment, it CANNOT be done through passing laws in our individual state governments nor through the US Congress. It needs to be PROPOSED either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures with finally being approved by ratification by three-fourths of the States (38 of 50 States)!

So, this NEW law that was passed by the Maine State legislature was just a colossal waste of time and taxpayer money because this law which essentially corrects/amend an unconstitutional law, really achieves nothing because We the People don't have to obey an unconstitutional law to begin with*. What needs to be done is to actually follow the US Constitution and NOT PASS STUPID UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS IN THE FIRST PLACE!

-*The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it . . .
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one.
An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law.
Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
— Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late 2nd Ed. Section 256). (See THIS LINK for more info)