This Little Light Of Mine

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Who Died And Made WHO And The UN The World Food Police/God?

UN Unveils Plan For American Advertisement Guidelines

By Blake Neff Published: February 23, 2015
Fat kids are serious business. So serious, in fact, that the United Nations is urging countries to let its bureaucrats micromanage what foods are allowed to advertise on TV.
The European branch of the World Health Organization (WHO), the health arm of the U.N., is trying to stop childhood obesity by urging countries to adopt an international blueprint that would ban almost all food advertisements targeted at children and place substantial regulatory influence in the hands of the UN.
Advocates of advertising restrictions argue that children learn to identify brands early in childhood, and that those who see lots of junk food advertising ultimately eat more of it and wind up becoming obese in higher numbers.
The WHO’s international bureaucrats believe that abolishing food marketing towards children is a helpful step to rolling back obesity, and last week’s announcement complained that individual governments are not acting fast enough to please them.
“Despite progress in some countries, government action to restrict such marketing remains less than optimal,” the group’s announcement said. That is simply unacceptable, and WHO officials hope that by taking care of all the actual work in deciding what foods to ban, national governments will more easily follow their lead.
With that in mind, last week, WHO’s Regional Office for Europe released a “nutrient profile model” that it recommends as the model for how countries go about deciding what foods should be locked out of advertising to children. Such a model is currently only used in a handful of countries, including Norway, the U.K. and Denmark, but WHO is hoping that with its nudging more countries will imitate these policies.
The exhaustive model breaks foods into 17 different groups, ranging from processed fruits and vegetables to cheese. Each category is evaluated on its nutritional content per 100g of food. Foods that exceed thresholds for sugar, fat, salt or calories would be barred from any marketing that would increase the food’s appeal to children. For example, a cheese would fall under the ban if it contains at least 20g of fat or 1.3g of salt per 100g.
If adopted, the model would totally prohibit all advertisements for chocolate, candy, cake, sugary soda, ice cream and fruit juice. The only foods subject to no restrictions whatsoever are meats fresh fruits, poultry and vegetables.
While that level of suppression may strike some as a heavy dose of statism, especially when pushed by a transnational organization, WHO argues that it’s long overdue.
“Given the current epidemic of childhood obesity across Europe, there is no justification for marketing products that have little nutritional value and contribute to unhealthy diets,” WHO official Dr. Gauden Galea said in the organization’s statement. “The tool that we are offering to countries to adapt and use would protect children from the harmful effects of marketing of foods high in energy, saturated fats, trans fatty acids, free sugars and salt.”
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Socialism/Fascism Has Been The Liberal Platform For A LONG Time!

10 Of The Most Idiotic Quotes From Liberal Hero Franklin D. Roosevelt

1. “There seems to be no question that [Mussolini] is really interested in what we are doing and I am much interested and deeply impressed by what he has accomplished and by his evidenced honest purpose of restoring Italy.”

This comment was made by Roosevelt in early 1933. It is hard to tell if he was simply being ignorant of Mussolini’s track record or if he really did approve of his oppressive policies.
Benito Mussolini, Fascist leader of Italy from 1922 to 1943, is considered one of the most brutal leaders in recent world history. During his time as Prime Minister, he reduced the influence of the judiciary, stifled free press and arrested political opponents before eventually declaring himself dictator of Italy.
Mussolini then banned opposition parties, expelled over 100 members of parliament, enacted the death penalty for political crimes, increased the amount of secret police activities and abolished local elections. During World War II, Mussolini partnered with Adolf Hitler of Germany and Hideki Tojo of Japan to form the Axis Powers.
2. “I just have a hunch that Stalin is not that kind of man. Harry [Hopkins] says he’s not and that he doesn’t want anything except security for his own country, and I think that if I give him everything I possibly can and ask nothing from him in return, noblesse oblige, he won’t try to annex anything and will work with me for a world of democracy and peace.”
Roosevelt also apparently underestimated, and was somewhat sympathetic toward Joseph Stalin. This quote, made in response to proposed containment against the Soviet Union in 1943, shows that Roosevelt thought quite highly of Stalin’s motives and was nearly oblivious to his wicked intentions.
Yet another brutal dictator, Stalin’s aggressive actions in Europe following World War II would lead to the Soviet Union becoming the US’s biggest rival for the next 40 years. In addition to the 20 million Soviet troops and civilians who died during World War II, it is estimated that another 20 million people died as a direct result of Stalin during his time as ruler.
#3. “In my Inaugural I laid down the simple proposition that nobody is going to starve in this country. It seems to me to be equally plain that no business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country.”
This quote from 1933 reveals just how little Roosevelt thought of private businesses and what they deemed to be necessary to survive. Despite economic realities, Roosevelt thought that every business should supply a “living wage,” and perhaps even more striking, that any businesses that do not (or cannot) supply such a wage have no right to exist. This populist exclamation shows complete economic illiteracy and neglects the many entry-level jobs which are never meant to serve such a purpose as granting a living. In fact, some jobs return to employers such a small amount that it would require that they go “into the red” in order to pay a living wage.
#4. “Great accumulations of wealth cannot be justified on the basis of personal and family security. In the last analysis such accumulations amount to the perpetuation of great and undesirable concentration of control in a relatively few individuals over the employment and welfare of many, many others.”
Once again, Roosevelt strikes a very socialist tone with his remarks. In this address to Congress in 1935, he decries the rich and wonders for what reason they need so much money, when it could instead be used by government for much more “benevolent” purposes. In the same address, Roosevelt would suggest that in addition to the estate tax, there should be inheritance, succession and legacy taxes, as well as gift taxes to avoid evasion. This kind of class warfare is familiar, as it is regularly spouted by modern-day liberals.
#5. “The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism – ownership of government by an individual, by a group.”
In this message to Congress in 1938, Roosevelt fear-mongers about a day when “private power” becomes stronger than government. Oddly enough, isn’t this the way which the Founders crafted the Republic? Isn’t government supposed to be beholden to private individuals, rather than the other way around?
Perhaps the most amazing part about this quote is its irony. Fascism is defined by dictionary.com as “a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.” This definition is eerily similar to the kind of government that was in place during FDR’s presidency.
#6. “Taxes, after all, are the dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society.”
Paraphrasing from Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in a 1936 address in Massachusetts, Roosevelt spouts one of the most common fallacies in modern liberal thought: that there is “greatness” and “patriotism” in taxation. This belief that we must pay burdensome taxes in order to maintain any sort of modern civilization is old and tired. The American Revolution was fought due to the strong attitudes against the burdens of taxation. To legitimize taxes as some sort of minor inconvenience and trivial infringement upon liberty, which is what is truly necessary to maintain order, is downright intellectually dishonest.
#7. “Not only our future economic soundness, but the very soundness of our democratic institutions depends on the determination of our government to give employment to idle men.”
In this Fireside Chat from 1938, Roosevelt uses yet another liberal economic fallacy in rather dramatic fashion. Public works projects are some of the most popular government investments among the general public. However, their usefulness as a step toward economic improvement is a tenuous argument at best; the government must take more from taxpayers so that they may pay new public workers, whose jobs will provide only temporary employment. Public works were a central part of the New Deal, a program whose lack of success is well-documented. Furthermore, it is fair to say that “future economic soundness” and “our democratic institutions” depend on thousands of factors more important than inefficient government programs like public works; most notably overall liberty.
#8. “You issue an executive order here for your group of blacks, and the Poles are going to call for one, and you’re going to have this group and that group calling for one, and there’ll be no end to it. Now I’m willing to see to it that these jobs are opened up and I think that we can do that, but I can’t issue any executive order.”
As much as FDR cared for public works, such enthusiasm apparently didn’t translate when it came to disfavored groups. Roosevelt had long taken action to discourage protests by black Americans against discrimination, including Jim Crow laws in the South. He sent spies into the movement and wire-tapped their offices. When leader of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters A. Philip Randolph had his request for an end to discriminatory government policies rejected by Roosevelt, he threatened to stage a March on Washington. Wanting to prevent such action, Roosevelt was willing to negotiate. Randolph asked for an executive order guaranteeing black Americans jobs, to which Roosevelt responded with the insensitive quote above.
#9. “The only concession I might make to him (King Saud) is to give him the 6 million Jews we have in the United States.”
Roosevelt made this anti-Semitic statement during the February 1945 Yalta Conference with Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Roosevelt was scheduled to meet with Arabian despot King Ibn Saud after the Conference, leading Stalin to ask Roosevelt what concessions he might make to Ibn Saud regarding the Middle East. This quote shows both Roosevelt’s ignorance and his complete disregard for the seriousness of the Holocaust (which was, after all, still occurring at the time).
#10. “I don’t care so much about the Italians, they are a lot of opera singers, but the Germans are different. They may be dangerous.”

There is so much racism and absurdity contained in this one quote. While it may at first appear as a playful joke, the context makes this quote ever more dark and sadistic. Made in response to a plan to intern Germans and Italians living in the US (as was done with Japanese Americans), Roosevelt generalizes and stereotypes millions, without any apparent regard for the implications of what he is saying.

Still Think America Is Not A Socialistic Regime Nightmare? THEN READ THIS About Florida!



Pastor Mike Olive, Common Ground Church
Pastor Mike Olive, Common Ground Church
City-code enforcement officer, Gerard A. Coscia – wearing a hoodie – was sent to the Common Ground Church on Feb. 9 to clandestinely film the worship service, reported the Examiner.The City of Lake Worth, in Palm Beach County, has taken the position all churches are required to obtain a “business license” to conduct worship services. It is using city employees to covertly attend services and acquire evidence, including video, “for future court presentation.”
The following Sunday, Coscia returned to the church, which meets in the Coffee Grounds Coffee Bar, handed his business card to pastor Mike Olive and told him, “This Sunday is your last Sunday.”
Olive said he had never received a notice from the city for any violation of any local law, and only learned a non-compliance affidavit had been issued when a church employee checked the city website.
“I inspected the property and found the following violations: Business-rental property found without a current City of Lake Worth business license, specifically to operate as a church, or a house of worship,” Coscia wrote in his case narrative.
“I walked back to the Coffee Bar and was able to visualize … what appeared to be a ministry in progress,” including: “Someone speaking from a podium.” “A [sic] overhead TV or projection with scripture verse on it.” “Rows of people sitting in chairs on both sides like a gathering setting.” “People holding what appeared to be bibles or religious books as one had a cross on it.” The report stated that a video was captured on the “city phone” to be used “for future court presentation.”
But Common Grounds Coffee Bar does have a business license, Olive told the Lake Worth Tribune. He should know – he owns the business. And the site is not a church – it’s a coffee shop that leases space to a church every Sunday morning in the same manner other city restaurants and businesses rent their back rooms to neighborhood groups for their meetings. The Common Grounds site has also hosted open-mic nights and leased space for English classes for immigrants and to Narcotics Anonymous and Alcoholics Anonymous for meetings.
Olive also noted that while the church and business share similar names, they are not identical: Common Ground vs. Common Grounds.
“Our message has been amazingly stable, and it’s: Love God, love people,” he said. Many of the 120-130 who attend weekly are in recovery from substance abuse.
Olive said he had heard that City Commissioner Andy Amoroso, who owns a newsstand and gay-pornography shop in Lake Worth, was telling people Olive and his church were “anti-gay,” a charge Olive denied and attempted to address personally with Amoroso.
Olive said Amoroso told him, “You better not have a church there. That better not be a church,” referring to the coffee bar.
It was after that exchange the code-compliance officer was sent to observe the service – based on an “anonymous complaint,” according to William Waters, who oversees the Code-Compliance Department.
“All I know is they’re a coffee shop that’s holding church services, and they cannot hold church services,” Amoroso told the Tribune.
City officials have circled the wagons on the issue.
The city has threatened Common Ground’s landlord with daily fines up to $500 and foreclosure if the “violation” is not corrected by the landlord making the church get a “business license” to meet for worship.
Mark Woods, the manager of the city’s Code-Compliance Department, insists all houses of worship in the city must have a special business license.
“A duck is a duck,” City Manager Michael Bornstein told the Tribune. “If someone is holding religious services as a church, it’s a church.” He said the city was forced to take action “to protect the community.”
“So, all they have to do is go through the conditional land-use process to make sure the impacts have been assessed … if they’re a small church, it shouldn’t be a big deal.”
But it’s already proving to be a big deal for other churches.
“It’s brand new,” pastor Joan Abell of the First Presbyterian Church told the Tribune. “We’ve been there 99 years, and we’ve never had to have a license.”
A church official, told there would be no fee for the business license if the church produced paperwork showing it has been approved as a tax-exempt organization by the IRS, hit a brick wall when trying to comply. The city employee refused to accept the church’s documentation.
In a follow-up meeting with Commissioner Amoroso about the new license requirement, a church member was told, “Oh, it’s for your own good.”
Pastor Olive isn’t buying it, and he’s prepared to fight it in court with the help of Liberty Counsel, based in Orlando.
“It’s unconstitutional,” said Olive. “They can’t deny us a right to practice our religion in the city.”
“The city’s actions are completely baseless,” said Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel.
“Lake Worth’s city ordinances specifically exempt churches and charitable organizations from needing a business license; state and federal law require local land use decisions to give equal treatment to secular and sacred assemblies; and the Free Exercise clause forbids government from prohibiting religious meetings. The coffee shop in which Common Ground Church meets has a business license, just as did the previous secular owner who hosted bands and similar gatherings.
“Government employees are public servants and prohibited by the Constitution from inhibiting religious freedom. That is a far cry from sneaking around and into a church and acting like KGB agents,” said Staver.

TAKE ACTION: Stop the Nazi medical tyranny in Oregon and Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward

This is a question by THIS writer:

Is it a coincidence that one of Senator Haywood's name is a GERMAN name (Steiner) and that she is promoting Nazi-like medical tyranny?
****************************************
 by Mike Adams, Health Ranger - NaturalNews.com

Oregon state senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward calls for government to physically violate children by force with vaccine mandate echoing Nazi crimes against humanity

Oregonians are about to find themselves living in a bona fide medical police state if State Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward gets her way. She's spearheading changes to state law that would eliminate philosophical and religious exemptions for vaccines, thereby forcing all parents to have their children physically violated with extremely toxic substances still used in vaccines: mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and monosodium glutamate -- all still used in vaccines as openly admitted by the CDC.

Nazi fascism is deeply rooted in the belief that the state owns your body -- a belief now shared by Sen. Steiner Hayward. Under the banner of "science," Nazi scientists readily endorsed all the following "medical science" policies while claiming they were all necessary for the "greater good of society."

• Forced killings of the physically handicapped
• Forced euthanasia of the elderly
• Mass killings of people suffering from chronic disease
• Forced sterilization of the mentally retarded
• Forced gassing to death of those deemed "genetically inferior" by scientists

See Nazi public health propaganda posters here.

Nazi science is alive and well in America today, thanks to people like Steiner Hayward

All of these wildly unethical, human-rights-violating programs were spearhead by people who invoked the exact same logic and abandonment of morality now demonstrated by Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is not just willing to skirt the boundaries of medical ethics and human rights, she is thrilled to obliterate that line in her zeal to achieve a government-enforced medical dictatorship over your private body.

Once that line is destroyed, there's no stopping where it goes: mandatory organ harvesting "for the greater good." Mandatory abortions of genetically "inferior" babies (with forced government DNA testing of your baby required by law). Government revocation of your reproductive "rights" if your own health does not meet the government's strict standards. (GATTACA) Oregon state death panels that demand everyone be euthanized at age 65 to save the state money on Medicaid... there's no end to the horrors of a government that has zero respect for human dignity and medical freedom.

If you've ever wondered how a group of the world's most brilliant scientists once marched the world's most scientifically advanced nation (Germany) down the path of genocide and mass death, look no further than the schemes and words of Oregon state Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward. She is the poster child for the kind of medical tyranny that has already lead straight to genocide once before in human history. Who will take a stand and stop Steiner Hayward from repeating that dark chapter of history with the citizens of the state of Oregon?

What's most astonishing to me is to think back about how many courageous American men and women lost their lives in World War II in order to defeat Nazi tyranny and bring down a government regime that has spiraled out of control, placing everyone's liberty and safety at risk. Now people like Steiner Hayward are frantically trying to bring back that same tyranny -- and she's in a position of power to make it happen unless the People of Oregon stop her.

Click here to see my recent comparison of America's modern-day vaccine propaganda with Nazi-era eugenics propaganda. The similarities are beyond eerie...

Not only should Steiner Hayward's medical police state actions be utterly rejected by the public; she should be recalled from public office by the People of Oregon for daring to pursue the agenda of quack science vaccine lunatics who are nothing short of mentally ill for wanting to physically violate the bodies of children with the toxic chemicals still used in vaccines today.

Tell this out-of-control Oregon legislator to keep her needles away from our children!

It's time to let your voice be heard and tell these tyrannical, out-of-control legislators to keep their needles away from our children!

92% of Americans reject vaccine tyranny

The public is fed up with medical tyranny, and both the entire medical profession and the mainstream media have lost tremendous credibility over this contrived, wholly fabricated vaccine propaganda scheme. Even USA Today, which recently published a column calling for the arrest and imprisonment of "anti-vaxxers," recently hosted a public poll asking whether Americans should be forced to be vaccinated against their will.

The public response? 92% of people REJECTED mandatory vaccines:



Even the American Medical Association is openly opposed to mandatory vaccines. Its own Code of Ethics guidelines clearly establish the principle of "informed consent" for all medical procedures, stating that doctors who fail to respect their patients' decisions are operating in total violation of established medical ethics.

Here's the full statement from the AMA's Code of Ethics page, section 8.08 - Informed Consent:

The patient's right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient's care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice. The physician has an ethical obligation to help the patient make choices from among the therapeutic alternatives consistent with good medical practice. Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent. In special circumstances, it may be appropriate to postpone disclosure of information, (see Opinion E-8.122, "Withholding Information from Patients").

Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients. The quantity and specificity of this information should be tailored to meet the preferences and needs of individual patients. Physicians need not communicate all information at one time, but should assess the amount of information that patients are capable of receiving at a given time and present the remainder when appropriate. (I, II, V, VIII)


It is astonishing that Sen. Steiner Hayward now wants to make the violation of the AMA's medical ethics a routine feature of Oregon state law!

TAKE ACTION: Stop the Nazi medical tyranny in Oregon

From Health Impact News:

There is another public hearing scheduled on SB 442 for March 9, 2015. If you would like to tell Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward how you feel about this bill, here is how to contact her:

Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward
Democrat -- District 17 -- NW Portland/Beaverton
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1717
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-215, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.ElizabethSteinerHayward@state.or.us
Website: http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/steinerhayw...

Other members of the Senate Committee on Health Care:

Senator Chip Shields
Democrat -- District 22 -- Portland
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1722 District Phone: 503-231-2564
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-421, Salem, Oregon 97301
District Address: 2104 NE 45th Ave., Portland, OR 97213
Email: Sen.ChipShields@state.or.us
Website: http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/shieldsc

Senator Laurie Monnes Anderson
Democrat -- District 25 -- Gresham
Capitol Phone: 503-986-1725
Capitol Address: 900 Court St. NE, S-413, Salem, Oregon 97301
Email: Sen.LaurieMonnesAnderson@state.or.us
Website: http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/monnesander...


















When MEDICINE becomes MURDER

 by Mike Adams, Health Ranger - NaturalNews.com

With each passing day as vaccine fanaticism spreads like a virus of the mind across the mainstream media, America is marching down the path of genocide and heinous human rights violations in the name of "SCIENCE!"

The very arguments used by today's vaccine pushers to claim that the government should force everyone to be vaccinated against their will closely resemble the eugenics justifications of Nazi Germany.

The collection of Nazi propaganda posters you see below has been translated by Natural News in order to show the parallels between Nazi crimes against humanity and today's fanatical vaccine mandate schemes that are based on very similar moral justification and distorted logic.

Today, people like Oregon State Sen. Elizabeth Steiner Hayward are marching America down the path of Nazi Germany, using the exact same arguments and attempted moral justifications that were once invoked by Adolf Hitler.

Nazi propaganda poster: The Ideal Man

Along with policies of forced euthanasia, sterilization, organ harvesting and medical experimentation, the "science" Nazi regime attempted to use positive imagery to claim it was creating a better society.

The following Nazi poster shows the "ideal man and woman" as desired by the state:



In Pennsylvania, a similar poster promotes vaccines with an attempt at patriotism, saying you "Earn your stripe!" when you get vaccinated:


German poster advocating the forced euthanasia of the physically handicapped

This propaganda poster explains that diseased and physically handicapped people are a financial burden on the state. Therefore, the thinking goes, they should all be euthanized for the "greater good."

This is the same "greater good" logic now invoked by vaccine pushers in America who believe it is morally justified to harm and kill some children with vaccines because the policy serves the interests of the state:

A congenitally diseased or handicapped person costs the government 5.5 Reichsmark daily.

For 5.5 Reichsmark a healthy, sound family can live a full day of life.




This flu shot poster in the United States argues that flu shots "save lives," glossing over the reality that flu shots still contain mercury, a potent neurotoxic heavy metal that causes permanent brain damage:


Kill the mentally ill negros

This Nazi poster complains about the cost of the government providing care for a "mentally ill negro" who has been institutionalized for 16 years.

As with all the other posters shown here, the argument is that killing people like this negro is "good for society!" It's the same argument used with forced vaccinations, forced organ harvesting and the government's health care "death panels" in America today.

Mentally ill negro (English citizen)
16 years in an institution
RM 35,000 in costs



CDC commits scientific fraud to bury autism risk affecting African-Americans

In the United States, top CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson openly admitted that the CDC committed scientific fraud to bury data linking vaccines to autism in African-American boys.

As this truth emerged, the CDC went to extraordinary lengths to censor the story, and the entire mainstream media was ordered by the U.S. government to blackball the confession and avoid any mention of it. To this day, the confession of the CDC whistleblower remains the most heavily censored medical story in U.S. history.

Just like in Nazi Germany, America's medical system utterly abandons people of dark skin color, considering them "not worth saving." Medicine in America today is not just murder; it's also genocide.

Granny is next, too. Here's a real cover for Newsweek, announcing, "The Case for Killing Granny." The article argued that the U.S. government needed to save money by killing off the elderly:


Moral justification for the mass killing of the physically handicapped

This next poster argues for the forced killing of the physically handicapped by announcing how much money such people cost the state in health care expenses.

The message informs the people of Germany that their money is being wasted on handicapped citizens, implying that killing off those people creates a better society.

This congenitally handicapped person costs the nation, as a whole, 60,000 Reichsmark over a lifetime.

People this is your money.

Read Neuses Volk ("New People")

The monthly newsletter of the racially correct political bureau of the NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party)




This TIME Magazine issue argued that the elderly in America should be murdered by removing their feeding tubes as they lay in their hospital beds:




Murdering children in the name of God

This next poster invokes God, claiming that even God would not want sick or handicapped people to reproduce.

Therefore, the logic goes, it is the "will of God" that the state murder these "undesirables." This is based on the belief that the state owns the people -- the very same idea now being aggressively pushed in America by vaccine fanatics who think the government has the right to force medical interventions on people against their wishes.

God cannot intend that the sick and infirmed propagate or reproduce sickness and infirmity (physical or mental weakness).


Worthless people are multiplying faster!

This poster explains how "worthless people" are multiplying faster than the healthy population. This includes the physically handicapped and mentally ill.

The Nazi war on handicapped people mirrors today's mainstream media war against so-called "anti-vaxxers" who happen to be among the most well-informed people in the world on health issues.

In order for any government to imprison or murder large numbers of people, it must first label them as a burden on society:

Those worth less are multiplying faster than the healthy population!

Number of pregnancies of mothers who had mentally ill children in school for the mentally disabled...
... the average mother in the city [is] concerned



Euthanasia candidates

This is a picture of children who are candidates for euthanasia. In America today, unvaccinated children are being labeled using the same derogatory language (even though most unvaccinated children are, in reality, far more intelligent and far healthier than vaccinated children).




Euthanasia victims vs. vaccine victims

In Nazi Germany, victims of birth deformities were frequently slated for euthanasia by the state.

In America today, victims of vaccine damage are utterly abandoned by the state, forgotten by the CDC and lying legislators like Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Here's an image of Germany's physically handicapped, scheduled for euthanasia:



And here are some images of American children damaged by vaccines -- who are then entirely abandoned by doctors, the media and lawmakers:

Neurologically damaged by the DPT vaccine:



Extreme tissue damage caused by vaccines:



The HPV vaccine turned this normal, healthy girl into a brain-damaged victim of vaccines:



Another severe skin reaction following vaccination:



Hitler orders health authorities to find more people to euthanize the terminally ill

Under a medical police state system -- which is precisely what is now being constructed in Oregon, California and many other states across America -- the state can determine when to kill you. The state owns your body, after all, and that precedent was already established when the people refused to resist vaccine mandates.

On Sep. 1, 1939, Adolf Hitler ordered Germany's medical doctors to recruit more people who would name people to be euthanized against their will.

Included on this list for euthanasia targets were people with cancer, physical handicaps, liver disorders and other health challenges:

Letter from Adolf Hitler
Berlin Sept. 1, 1939

To the Reichsleiter (leader) Bouhler and Dr. Brandt (a Medical Dr.):

They have the responsibility to increase the authority of individuals who will be named to evaluate the terminally ill to determine whether euthanasia can be performed...



Forced sterilization of the innocent

This Nazi propaganda poster argued that Germany's forced euthanasia and sterilization policies were morally justified because other countries were doing the same thing.

In fact, there was "scientific consensus" at the time that any government could order the murder of handicapped, retarded or chronically ill citizens. Government-sponsored murder was justified under the same "greater good" logic used by vaccine pushers in America today:

We do not stand alone

In these countries similar laws exist: USA Denmark Norway Sweden Finland
The following countries are considering similar protection: Hungary England Switzerland [illegible]

Law for the Prevention of Offspring with Hereditary Diseases from 7/14/33





Mentally handicapped people are costing you a lot of money, so let's kill them all

This poster insists that mentally handicapped people should be killed because they are placing a burden on society.

You are sharing the load

A person with a hereditary disease costs on average RM 50,000 by the time they reach their 60th birthday.