The Clarion Edict Is Born!

Here is The Clarion Edict.
Hope you enjoy it!

Oppose Indefinite Military Detention

IMPORTANT  UPDATE: This bill has been consolidated with 3 other bills regarding this act (S.1254, 1255 &1256) and was submitted by Sen. Carl Levin on 11/15/11 AND IS NOW S.1867. Today (Nov. 29, 2011) is the last day for consideration and debate on this bill. This bill corresponds to the house bill H.R.1540 submitted by Rep. Howard P. McKeon on 4/14/11 and passed by the House on 5/26/11.
WRITE YOUR SENATORS TODAY to tell them to NOT pass this bill!!!

The U.S. Senate is considering the unthinkable: changing detention laws to imprison people — including Americans living in the United States itself — indefinitely and without charge.


The Defense Authorization bill — a "must-pass" piece of legislation — is headed to the Senate floor with troubling provisions that would give the President — and all future presidents — the authority to indefinitely imprison people, without charge or trial, both abroad and inside the United States.

Go HERE to send a letter to our senators telling them that Maine Citizens will NOT accept this and to NOT pass sections 1031 and 1032 in S.1253, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA).

J.A.I.L. 4 Judges

The Judicial Accountability Initiative Law, J.A.I.L., is a single-issue national grassroots organization designed to end the rampant and pervasive judicial corruption in the legal system of the United States. J.A.I.L. recognizes this can be achieved only through making the Judicial Branch of government answerable and accountable to an entity other than itself. At this time it isn't, resulting in the judiciary's arbitrary abuse of the doctrine of judicial immunity, leaving the People without recourse when their inherent rights are violated by judges.

This is EXACTLY what I meant when I said in my post "Maine Judges Blatantly Disregard The Rule Of Law" that Governor LePage needs to reconstruct  Maine's Judicial Responsibility and Disability Committee. This J.A.I.L. bill is intended to prevent the following acts of judicial malfeasance:

Any deliberate violation of law

Fraud or conspiracy

Intentional violation of due process of law

Deliberate disregard of material facts

Judicial acts without jurisdiction

Blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case

Any deliberate violation of the state or federal Constitutions

Once passed, the unconstitutional doctrine of Judicial Immunity applied unconditionally will no longer shield a judge guilty of any such misconduct.

I fully intend to bring this bill before the legislature or put it before the voters on the ballot for a constitutional amendment. Either way, this bill will guarantee "the people the right of redress of grievances against their government in an open, honest and complete manner without any appearance of impropriety and the people's unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, will no longer be "alienated" by government".


To read more about J.A.I.L. 4 Judges, CLICK HERE.

Congress Is About To Take Control Of The Internet!

CLICK HERE to view video and to send email to Congress.

The video above discusses the Senate version of the PROTECT IP Act, but the House bill that was introduced TODAY is much much worse.

It'll give the government new powers to block Americans' access websites that corporations don't like. The bill would criminalize posting all sorts of standard web content -- music playing in the background of videos, footage of people dancing, kids playing video games, and posting video of people playing cover songs.

This legislation will stifle free speech and innovation, and even threaten popular web services like Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook.

The bill was just introduced: We need to act now to let our lawmakers know just how terrible it is. Will you fill out the form above to ask your lawmakers to oppose the legislation?

Congress needs to hear from you, or this bill passes.

Bankers Manifesto of 1892

"We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our de- signs without fear of any organized resistance. 

    The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them. 

    At the coming Omaha convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation. The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. 

    When, through the process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. 

    History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism. The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party. 

    By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished." 

    The above was printed from the Banker's Manifesto for private circulation among leaders bankers only, also found in the Civil Servants' Year Book. "The Organizer" of January, and the "New American" of February, 1934. It is also found in the book, LIGHTNING OVER THE TREASURY BUILDING by John R. Elsom (p. 67). It is believed Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. first exposed the information to the nation, with hopes to warn the citizens by making the bankers' plans known.     

    Around the time of the Civil War the bankers wanted the lawmakers to pass "The National Bank Act of 1863". The bankers opposed Lincoln's Greenbacks because the banks did not receive the money and/or interest for free. 

    Lincoln's "Greenbacks" caused a furor among the banking circles. An editorial written in the London Times spoke of the bankers' policy which read, "If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become indurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the his- 

tory of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country (government) must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe." 

    The bankers then hurriedly met at a convention in Washington to find vulnerable Congressmen and Senators to support The National Banking Act of 1863. 

State of Maine Doesn't Care About Local Government Decisions!

The State of Maine and Walter Whitcomb, Maine Agricultural Commissioner are ignoring and disregarding the Local Food and Community Self-Governance passed nearly unanimously by the citizens of Blue Hill at their town meeting on April 4 and is suing the town for selling food and milk without State licenses.


This is just another way for the government to further control our food supply and regulate what we can consume and how we manage one of our most fundlamental rights, LIFE! 
If we let the government dictate how our food is grown, harvested and distributed, we will be at their mercy concerning additives, genetically modified food, pesticides, diseases and who we can buy it from. THIS HAS TO STOP! We the people have the right to have natural, locally grown and free from harmful additives, food  and make local ordinances that ensure and protect this right!


We also have the right to govern ourselves at the local level without being bullied by the state. If this was not so, why can each town decide on what to do about fireworks, even though the state says they are legal? The LOCAL government is higher on the ladder than the state and we have the RIGHT and the POWER to regulate how we will live and make rules that will protect our rights.


PLEASE, show your support for Blue Hill (and thus your own town as well) and let our state and Whitcomb know that this is completely unacceptable by going here: We Are All Farmer Brown and like the page to show your support. 
You can also write to Mr. Whitcomb here:  agriculture.commissioner@maine.gov
Write Attorney General William Schneider HERE
Write Governor Paul LePage HERE

The Clarion Edict

The Clarion Edict title was chosen by its publisher/editor, Debby Reagan, because she wanted her readers to know that they have an independent voice for them within the media. Clarion means a medieval trumpet. It also means clarity; clear. Edict means a proclamation with the force of law, an order or command. Ms. Reagan thought it was high time that the peoples voice was clearly proclaimed of what they want, need and think about their government, officials, constitutional rights,  veterans issues and all things patriotic without regards to any governmental party (or intrusion) or political affiliations,  gender, race, religion or creed. A TRUTHFUL reporting to the people of  their government leaders, agencies and corporations activities that the mainstream media will not report. Truly, an independent voice for the people so that it’s abundantly clear to one and all, what we demand from and of our government which we have created and are the masters of and which answers to us,

“We the People”.

The Clarion Edict - COMING SOON 

Is There Actually A Maine State Official That Cares?

I read earlier today a post made by Maine State Treasurer Bruce Poliquin about the MSHA (Maine State Housing Authority) inability to discern between "low income" housing and upscale living.
He wrote in part: "During the past 18 months, Maine State Housing Authority (MSHA) has been helping to develop the Elm Terrace affordable housing project in Portland. Architects, engineers, developers, and lawyers have already spent over $600,000 on the project. The 35 mostly 1 and 2-bedroom apartments are planned to be constructed within an historic building on downtown Congress Street.

Here’s the problem: Each “affordable” apartment is budgeted to cost $314,000. How can Maine taxpayers be expected to help pay for $314,000 “low-income” apartments when the median single-family home sells for $159,000?  Why should our fellow Mainers be asked to subsidize housing which they themselves cannot afford to live in"? (Read the rest of his article HERE).

He plans on asking tough questions like this at the MSHA meeting at 9:00am tomorrow morning. This meeting will do a first ever action, it will actually be audio recorded. So, there will be a record of all that was discussed. Seems like there might actually be ONE state official that really cares about us Mainers and our wallets! If so... KUDOS to you, Mr. Poliquin...you have this Mainer's support!

Opening a Bank Account Without a SSN

Hi, Just wanted to drop you a line to let you know about a recent small victory in the no-SSN corner.

I recently tried to open a bank account with my local bank , and when they asked for a SSN, I informed them that I didn't have one. They flatly refused and said that without a SSN that they absolutely could NOT open an account of any kind. I then proceeded thus to convince them that they were in the wrong: 1) I informed them that I had terminated my SSN legally in accordance with 20 CFR 3 A7 404.1905 and 2) I informed them that the bank could not be held legally responsible by anyone for failing to obtain a SSN from me pursuant to 31 CFR 103.34(a)(1) and 3) I informed them that under the Internal Revenue Code Section 6041, that they were not even required to provide any taxpayer identification numbers on the Form 1099 that they file with the IRS at the end of the year, and 4) I informed them that pursuant to 26 CFR 301.6109-1(c) that they were under no legal obligation to obtain a SSN from me, and 5) I informed them that 42 USC 408 makes it a FELONY to use threat, duress, or coercion to try to force a person by fear or deceit to provide his SSN in an unlawful manner. After a brief meeting with the banks controller and legal counsel, I received a phone call stating that I would be allowed to open a checking account. Please pass this information along to your readers, in hopes that it may help someone else who may find themselves in this situation.

Craig Burkholder

Harrisonburg, VA

A Patriotic Declaration That You WON'T Hear About VIA Mainstream Media!

This is a MUST READ! For the full declaration... CLICK HERE.

Our United Mission

We are finished with changing America to suit every anti-American whim… This time, the change is coming to Washington D.C.

It is not our intent to separate from any foreign King, nor to abolish or alter our Constitutional Representative Republic, but rather to restore it, as the Supreme law of this land, under which both the government and the governed must live.

Our united mission is to end the march of democratic socialism, which has become the most dangerous modern threat to American peace, prosperity, freedom and liberty and reinstate the republican form of self-governance guaranteed every citizen in the U.S. Constitution.

To accomplish this objective, the people responsible for the usurpation of the Constitution must be immediately removed from office and held fully accountable for their actions, setting an example for future generations, who must also be forever vigilant in the common defense of freedom and liberty.

The long train of abuses and usurpations must be brought to a swift end and the Constitutional Republic must prevail, or the United States of America will soon cease to exist.

Our mission is just – it is moral – it is legal and constitutional and it is necessary…

This is not a call to overthrow our entire institutions of government, or subvert the Law of the Land, but rather to restore those institutions to their honorable constitutional forms. As such, and under their oaths to the Constitution and the people whom they are sworn to protect and defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic, it is incumbent upon every citizen, veteran, soldier, officer and agent to use the tools of the people to protect the people and return our government to a Constitutional Republic of, by and for the people.

Let Freedom Ring! May the Creator, who endowed each of us with certain unalienable rights, among them the right to Life, Liberty and the individual Pursuit of Happiness free from government tyranny, bless this mission of, by and for the people of the United States, and may the Lord let freedom ring in America, once again.

We demand an end to government corruption, an end to despotic leadership in D.C., an end to the current assault on all decent and honest American taxpayers, businesses and honorable public servants of the people.

We demand the peaceful return of the people’s government, and we will remain resolute in the defense of the Constitution and the United States of America until the people can once again, feel secure in their nation and government.

IN GOD WE TRUST!
by JB Williams, Timothy Joseph Harrington, and Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.), ©2011, The United States Patriots Union, LLC

My Foreclosure Case

UPDATE: Since I wrote this, I have looked closely at the documents that were INITIALLY filed by the bank to start foreclosure and found out something VERY important. The promissory note that the bank filed to say that they had standing to sue, was never endorsed! That's right, no signature signing it over to the bank nor in blank is on the note! I was going by what the bank gave as evidence at the hearing.  But guess what, LOOK AT ALL THE DOCUMENTS FIRST FILED. Because to have standing to sue, AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF LITIGATION, the bank has to OWN everything otherwise, they can't even get in to start the suit! My case is on appeal at my state Supreme Court which has already vacated other suits for just this reason, that the note wasn't endorsed at the start of the case! Wish me luck. :-)

I had a hearing on Monday on my motion for reconsideration at the Springvale District Court in Maine.
At this hearing we were to discuss whether the plaintiff had standing, whether the court had erred in not granting me my motion for default, whether discovery was complete and what effect (if any) did a recent Maine Supreme Court decision in Beneficial Maine, Inc vs Timothy Carter had on this case.
I want to start by saying that the plaintiff, US Bank National Association was also supposed to provide (by judge's order) a memorandum of law with supporting exhibits showing how in their view that they had standing 15 days prior to the hearing, and they never did.
Since it was my motion that we were addressing, I got to argue first.
I first showed the court a chart I had made that showed the steps that a promissory note and the mortgage deed takes to be transferred into a trust fund. For my particular case, my note was endorsed in blank. Per the trust fund SAIL 2006-3's PSA (pooling and service agreement) the note and mortgage had to be transferred from the originator (Countrywide) to the sponsor (Lehman Brothers) to the depositor (Structured Assets Security) to the trustee (US Bank Nat Assoc) and then submitted to the trust fund. Since my note was blank endorsed, to prove that a true bill of sale has occured between all parties, 2 receipts had to be produced, one of transfer and one of acceptance (or delivery) for EACH party. This way, the trust fund can prove to the IRS that indeed it was sold and transferred each step of the way and they could retain their tax free status.
It also keeps the trust fund as brankruptcy remote as possible from the originator. That way, if the originator went brankrupt, the asset of my mortgage is several times removed from them so that they wouldn't be able to claim it in bankruptcy court. 
How did this effect me? Many ways.
First, regarding the case Beneficial vs Carter, that was about the foreclosing bank not having any documents submitted of business records meeting the exemption to the heresay rule. Meaning, none of their supporting documents to foreclose was above being "someone else said" that the defendant owes this and didn't pay and that the documents presented were legit. You can't say in court what someone else told you is fact. That is heresay. 
In my case, not only was this the case, but the ONLY documents provided was the "alleged" originals of the note & mortgage and 2 assignments. There were no receipts accompaning the blank endorsement. I asked for many materials for discovery and one of those were 'receipts". The bank has yet to deliver that. I also asked for a copy of the PSA. Haven't got that either. So that addressed the discovery question, it isn't complete.
Going back now to the steps needed to transfer my note & mortgage, I showed the judge where this wasn't completed. In my case, the note being blank endorsed, and having no date, we had to look at the assignment of the mortgage and the PSA. There were TWO assignments of my mortgage recorded at my county register of deeds office. One was from MERS as nominee for Countrywide to US Bank Nat Assoc on October 16, 2007. The 2nd from US Bank to the trust fund on August 20, 2009. 
First problem: The assignment was from CW to US Bank. This skipped the sponsor and the depositor. The PSA rules weren't followed. This created a break in the chain of title as they reported that it was sold and completed as the PSA told them, but never recorded the assignments.
2nd problem: Since the assignment showed that MERS/CW assigned my mortgage to US Bank on October 16, 2007, and that this assignment was from the ORIGINATOR, then it is logical and safe to also say that this date can also be attributed to the endorsement of the note, as the note HAS TO STAY with the mortgage. And there's no way that CW would endorse IN BLANK a note prior to this date. Why? Because when a note is endorsed in blank, it becomes a bearer instrument. This means, whoever bears (or has in hand) the note, OWNS it. So, it would be fool hearted to leave such a document laying around for anyone to pick up and walk off with it. So, the date of endorsement would be the same date that they assigned the mortgage. Well, if you look at the endorsement, it was endorsed by David A. Spector, Managing Director of CW. As of October 16, 2007, Mr. Spector no longer worked for CW and hadn't since August of 2006. So, how could he endorse a note for CW 14 months after leaving CW?
3rd problem: The dates of the assignments. The trust fund closing date was May 26, 2006. How can an assignment of mortgage 17 months after closing to the trustee, and 39 months after closing to the trust fund, be a valid transfer? The trust fund can NOT accept any transfer after the closing date. Plus, the PSA and filing documents to the SEC all said that the transfers had ALREADY been completed BY THE CLOSING DATE. By their own admission and exhibits and by the assignments recorded at the Register of Deeds office, this is proved false.
4th problem: MERS assigned the mortgage. In Maine, MERS has no standing to do so by the decision of the Maine Supreme Court.
5th problem: MERS assigned it as nominee for CW. On the date of the 1st assignment (October 16, 2077), CW was no longer the one who owned the note & mortgage. As per the PSA, CW became the SERVICER of the trust fund and no longer had any ownership rights on May 1, 2006. So, they could not assign something that they did not own.
6th problem: On June 21, 2011 the court ordered the plaintiff to produce for my inspection the original note & mortgage at a meeting in a conference room at the court. We met (I had 2 witnesses with me) and Bridget Dornbach, attorney with Shechtman, Halperin & Savage out of RI, brought documents that were all on legal size paper. On the 1st page of the mortgage, was a stamp of attestment from a CW employee stating that it was a true and accurate COPY OF THE ORIGINAL! But, she passed them off as originals. At a hearing to hear my motion to have the plaintiff produce the exact documents that Dornbach had showed me in July for the hearing on November 7th, there was a different lawyer from the firm, Miss Hawkins, with a SECOND set of "alleged' originals saying that these were what Dornbach had shown me in July as clearly, the copy I had made Dornbach give me of what she brought were certified copies of the originals. (DUH! They finally caught on that the 'alleged' original said it was a copy). At the November 7th hearing, Ms. Dornbach showed up, with the SECOND set saying that this is what she showed me in July and was offended that I was calling her a liar! Ahhhh, but I had the proof of an exact copy that she gave me to give to the judge that this was not so! So WHICH set are we to believe are the originals since the lawyers have stated BOTH were original?
7th problem: On the "alleged" original, the last page that had the notary signature and seal, the seal was flat and black in color. On an original, the seal will be white in color and raised so that when you run your finger over it, you can feel it. The only way it'd be flat & black is when you've copied it.
8th problem: The copy that the plaintiff submitted to file this claim in the very beginning had 2 black circles at the top of each page of the mortgage. This meant that the original had been paper hole punched to fit inside a folder that had 2 metal rods that folded over to keep the documents inside. Again, when you COPY these, it would show up on the copy as black circles. So, if the original has holes, how did the "allege" original being presented no longer have holes? How did the paper grow back?
It is quite clear from all of the above reasons & explanations that not only doesn't the plaintiff have the originals, but the documents were never properly transferred to the trust fund, thus the trust fund does not own my note & mortgage even if we could find the originals! The plaintiff hasn't proven that they even have the business records that is exempt from the heresay rule. They have fallen extremely short to prove standing. The judge, Hon. Michael P. Cantara, has taken all of the evidence and testimony and is now deliberating his decision. I can't see how he could come to any other conclusion but that the plaintiff hasn't proven standing and thus the case is dismissed. And since there is clearly fraud in their presentation of two sets of originals and with the deception of stating they own my note by the problem of the dates, notary stamp, copy problems and endorsement problem, the case should be dismissed with prejudice! Because if they manufactured documentation for this round, what makes anyone think that they won't manufacture different ones for another shot at this? Let's see which side of this issue, and the LAW, Judge Cantara decides to be on when he makes his decision!

READ THIS BEFORE You Vaccinate Your Child, or Even YOU!

VIEW THIS VIDEO FIRST: http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=AF36B271EF61579BEAD6969F6DEC763D


The nation of Finland has now openly admitted that the swine flu vaccine "conclusively" causes narcolepsy, a chronic nervous system disorder that makes people uncontrollably fall asleep. The Finnish government, in acknowledging this link, says it will pay for "lifetime medical care" for 79 children who have been irreparably damaged by the swine flu vaccine. (http://news.yahoo.com/finland-vows-care-narcolepsy-kids-had-swine-flu-183019281.html)

The U.S. government, of course, still refuses to admit vaccines cause any harm whatsoever. Both the government and the vaccine industry continue to push the fabricated fairy tale that "vaccines are safe and effective," meaning they harm no one but help everyone. Yet the truth is practically the polar opposite:Vaccines harm countless millions of children each yearin ways that are usually never linked to vaccines (mild mental retardation, suppressed immune function, learning disabilities, etc.). At the same time,vaccines are all but worthless at preventing infections. Even the vaccine industry's own research shows that flu shots only work on 1 out of 100 people, meaning they're completely useless for 99 percent of those who take them (http://www.naturalnews.com/029641_vaccines_junk_science.html).
There is absolutely no question in the mind of any reasonably informed person that vaccines cause neurological damage, including (but not limited to) autism. Only the corporate-whore scientists around the world continue their charade that vaccines are not linked to autism; or that vaccines even work in the first place. Most Americans haven't yet heard the secret interview withMerck vaccine scientist Dr. Maurice Hillemanwhere he openly admits vaccines carry dozens of strains of cancer-causing "stealth" viruses. Read the transcript here: http://www.naturalnews.com/033584_Dr_Maurice_Hilleman_SV40.html

Listen to the interview at:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=13EAAF22CDA367BB3C2F94D2CD90EF7B
Similarly, most people still don't know thatDr. Jonas Salk, the celebrated "grandfather" of vaccines who is credited with creating the polio vaccine, was an unindicted medical criminal who committed heinous crimes against humanity in the name of "medical science." (http://www.naturalnews.com/031564_Jonas_Salk_medical_experiments.html)

In fact, the whole history of vaccines and medicine has been utterly distorted by the medical establishment to paint vaccines in a glorified light of public health. But the real story is that vaccines are now -- and have always been -- tools for causing disease and promoting sickness so that the pharmaceutical industry can benefit as a result.
Remember, this is the same industry that got caught conducting outrageous medical experiments on Guatemalan prisoners (http://www.naturalnews.com/033483_Guatemalan_prisoners_medical_experiments.html). These are the same people who ran Tuskegee experiments on African Americans, too (http://www.naturalnews.com/029924_medical_experiments_Guatemala.html).

Do you honestly think these same vaccine criminals would not also use innocent children for their own mass inoculation medical experiments? Remember: These are hard-core, Nazi-style criminals we're talking about here. This is who runs the pharmaceutical industry. The former chairperson of Bayer, for example, was aconvicted Nazi war criminal who was indicted and sentenced at the Nuremburg trials:

Don't believe me? Read your history:

"Dr. Fritz ter Meer, a director of IG Farben who was directly involved in developing the nerve gas, Zyklon-B, which killed millions of Jews, was sentenced to seven years in prison but was released after four years through the intervention of Rockefeller and J.J. McCloy, then U.S. High Commissioner for Germany. An unrepentant Fritz ter Meer, guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity, returned to work in Bayer where he served as Chairman for more than 10 years, until 1961. This same ter Meer, a convicted Nazi war criminal, went on to become one of the initiators of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in 1962, an organization that was nurtured by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and latterly the World Trade Organization (WTO)." (http://www.naturalnews.com/024534_Europe_health_WHO.html)
You see,every world government already knows that vaccines are murder. They know vaccines kill and maim children. They know vaccines cause autism and neurological disorders. They know this and then they keep promoting vaccines anyway. Why? Because they are mass murderers who have philosophical roots in Nazi Germany and the eugenics movement. Even today's FDA can be traced backed to eugenics and population control. Bill Gates, who promotes world vaccination, openly admits that vaccines and health care can "reduce world population by 10 to 15 percent" if they "do a good job." (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html)

Don't believe me? Watch Bill Gates say it himself in this video:
http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=A155D113455FAC882A3290536575C723
Vaccines are not given to children with the "accident" that they kill some children and cause neurological disorders in others; no, they are given to children BECAUSE they cause neurological disorders, organ failure, infertility, reduced intelligence and numerous other side effects.


Today's vaccines create tomorrow's health care customers, you see.
FOR THE COMPLETE REPORT Learn more here: http://www.naturalnews.com/033816_swine_flu_vaccines_neurological_disorders.html#ixzz1aDE19hH4

Saturday, October 08, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

WANTED FOR STATE SANCTIONED MURDER!

First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me. - Pastor Martin Neimöller

STATE SANCTIONED MURDER IS WRONG... no matter what crimes an American citizen has committed... their constitutional rights to due process of law and to stand before a jury of their peers is still surmount to any governmental decisions. If the government can hunt down and EXECUTE even just ONE American (Anwar al-Awlaki), and WE THE PEOPLE ALLOW IT... who says YOU won't be the next one within their crosshairs?

Bachmann IS Right!

If you thought vaccines were safe, think again.Get informed. Learn the truth, and please share this story so that others may also be informed.
In seeking answers to why adolescent girls are suffering devastating health damage after being injected with HPV vaccines, SANE Vax, Inc decided to have vials of Gardasil tested in a laboratory. There, they found over a dozen Gardasil vaccine vials to be contaminated with rDNA of the Human Papillomavirus(HPV). The vials were purchased in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Poland and France, indicating Gardasil contamination is a global phenomenon.

This means that adolescents who are injected with these vials are being contaminated with a biohazard -- the rDNA of HPV. In conducting the tests, Dr. Sin Hang Lee found rDNA from both HPV-11 and HPV-18, which were described as "firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant."

That aluminum is also found in vaccines should be frightening all by itself, given that aluminum should  never be injected into the human body (it's toxic when ingested, and it specifically damages the nervous system). With the added discovery that the aluminum adjuvant also carries rDNA fragments of two different strains of Human Papillomavirus, this now reaches the level of a dangerous biohazard-- something more like abiological weaponrather than anything resembling medicine.

What all this means is that through Gardasil vaccines, innocent young girls are being injected with the recombinant DNA of HPV, and that this biohazardous substance persists in their blood. The implications of this are rather scary, as Dr. Lee explains:

"Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA."

The vaccine industry, of course, has a long and dark history of its vaccines being contaminated with cancer-causing viruses and other frightening contaminants. Watch this astounding video of Merck scientist Dr. Hilleman openly admitting that polio vaccines were widely contaminated with SV40 viruses that cause cancer:

http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=13EAA...

It's called "Merck vaccine scientist admits presence of SV40 and AIDS in vaccines - Dr. Maurice Hilleman" and was partially narrated by Dr. Len Horowitz. You can view the full transcript of this extraordinary interview at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/033584_D...

Excerpts written by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger Editor of NaturalNews.com

For the FULL article:http://www.naturalnews.com/033585_Gardasil_contamination.html

US Constitution Invalid in Idaho - Debunked?

I have just received an email from a trusted source on the article I just posted about Idaho invaladating the constitution and it stated:
"Doesn't seem to be so...one of my researchers got into the minutia and seems to have debunked the incendiary nature of the post...All is not as it seems...".


Hmmmmm.... let me get to the nitty gritty on this and I'll report back to y'all!


My source added:
It wasn't a "case" before the Idaho Supreme Court, just a "complaint"...no formal "ruling" was issued just comments (not opinions)...Someone was salting the Steele situation to get people riled up and sympathetic. And, they did...All sorts of bogus conclusions and headlines flying around the airy fairy, creamy dreamy, fruity loopy movement !

US Constitution Invalid in Idaho

NEWS: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

August 18, 2011

US CONSTITUTION INVALID, SAID IDAHO SUPREME COURT

Private Attorneys No Longer Allowed

In a stunning, far-reaching and precedent-setting ruling issued by the
Idaho Supreme Court this past week, the right to confidential
communications between attorneys and individuals charged with crimes
under the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution henceforth is no longer
enforced in Idaho.

Without comment, the entire bench of the Idaho Supreme Court has ruled
that the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution no longer applies within
the boundary of Idaho. This result was obtained from the summary
dismissal of a complaint lodged against Assistant US Attorney Traci
Whelan by Attorney Edgar J. Steele, formerly admitted to practice before
all courts in the states of Idaho, Washington, Oregon and California, as
well as virtually all Federal Courts up to and including the US Supreme
Court.

Steele’s complaint about AUSA Whelan’s behavior first was sent to the
Idaho State Bar (ISB), and then was forwarded to the Idaho Supreme Court
because Whelan herself sits on the ISB attorney committee.

Attorney Steele’s complaint went much further than making out a
prima-facie case of criminal behavior on the part of AUSA Whelan and the
entire justice department of the United States of America up to and
including President Barrack Obama, not to mention his Attorney General,
Eric Holder, who nominally heads up the US Justice Department as all of
them are complicit in the intrusion into the former right to confidential
attorney/client communication.

“I asked them (the Idaho Supreme Court Judges) to take judicial notice of
documents in the custody of both the justice department and Idaho’s
Federal District Court,” said Steele, reached today in his jail cell in
downtown Moscow, Idaho.

“I wrote letters to attorneys plainly marked ‘Legal Mail’ and addressed
to lawyers with the title Attorney at Law. The FEDS opened those sealed
letters, photo copied them, then sent them back to me as part of their
pre-trial document production, a clear violation of US Constitution’s
Sixth Amendment guarantee of ‘Assistance of Counsel’ to criminal
defendants like me.”

For over 200 years the US Supreme Court has held that a criminal
defendant’s right to “Assistance of Counsel” is among the oldest of
rights held inviolate and necessarily includes the ability to communicate
in strict confidence with any attorneys about the defendant’s situation.
Until this week’s ruling by the Idaho Supreme Court, that is.

Steele alleged (and proved, by reference to documents both on file with
US District Court and included with his formal complaint) that AUSA
Whelan intentionally and secretly eavesdropped into conversations between
Steele and all three of his to-date “attorneys of record,” Roger Peven,
Robert McAllister and Wesley Hoyt. Conversations that Whelan invaded
included those made by telephone at two different county jails (Spokane,
Washington and Bonner, Idaho), in the attorney visiting booths at Spokane
County jail. Further, eavesdropping into attorney/client communications
also occurred in the previously-believed sacrosanct confines of the US
District Court’s own attorney-client interview rooms in the US Federal
District court building in Boise, Idaho.

The confidential conversations secretly recorded by AUSA Whelan spanned
several months, both prior to and directly following Steele’s trial and
conviction on four federal charges that, combined, could net him over 70
years in a federal penitentiary.

Steele alleges that the confidential information gleaned from his
conversations with his lawyers is what led to his conviction in what he
maintains is, “The phoniest, trumped-up, case I’ve ever seen.” The
Federal Judge Lynn Winmill who presided at Steele’s trial, ruled
retroactively on February 11, 2011 that Steele had “waived” his
attorney-client privilege simply by daring to speak with a private
attorney by phone, seeking to interview him for possible representation.
Thus, the Court’s Order provided AUSA Whelan with cover from being
charged with a variety of State and Federal felonies that could see her
put behind bars for as long a sentence as Steele now faces.

“Now that the Idaho Supreme Court has reinforced the federal judge’s
clearly illegal ruling without considering all the evidence,” said
Steele. “This gives the appearance of the vast conspiracy involving the
US Justice Department, the US Federal District Courts, Idaho Supreme
Court, the FBI, and local counties who fraudulently tell inmates that
their calls are not being recorded, then record them anyway, giving
copies over to the U.S. prosecutor. This is what a police state is based
on, absolutely no privacy when even the pretense of attorney
confidentiality is gone. Even now, it can be seen that both Idaho’s
‘private’ state bar association and its supreme court are conspiring with
the Feds to deprive its citizens of their Constitutional rights.”

Steele added that applicable RICO statutes could net hundreds of State
and Federal officials, law officials that is, lengthy prison terms
including both Governor Butch Otter and President Barrack Obama. “Now
it’s going to be up to the US Supreme Court,” concluded Steele as Idaho’s
Latah County Sherriff’s deputies led him away to continue his now 14 plus
month incarceration for a crime he claims he can prove he did not commit
if granted the new trial he is seeking. The last trial was handled by an
attorney in such deep remorse over his personal disbarment that he could
not concentrate or perform his job as Steele’s trial counsel.

Federal Judge Lynn Winmill can be reached at: Chief Judge, District of
Idaho, Federal Building, 550 West Fort Street, Suite 039, Boise, Idaho
83724

US Attorney General Eric Holder’s address is: U.S. Department of Justice,
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001

Idaho Governor Butch Otter can be contacted at: Office of the Governor,
State Capital, P.O. Box 83720, Boise, ID 83720

“Help me, please,” cried out Steele as he was dragged away “somebody
please make them obey the law protecting attorney client privileged
communications or we are all doomed.” Idaho state officials refuse to
comment upon whether Idaho’s state constitution has also been suspended
by this week’s Idaho Supreme Court ruling, as it, too, obtained a
provision formerly thought to provide a measure of confidentiality to
communications between criminal defendants and their attorneys.

Steele offered himself for interview by any legitimate media
representative during regularly-scheduled visiting hours at Latah County
Jail, Moscow, Idaho. (Telephone number: 208-882-2216).